FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2002, 08:03 AM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 276
Post Christian excuses for troubling bible verses

I've noticed that some Christians attempt to cover up some troubling bible verses-verses which honestly, if you were to follow them, would pretty much test human endurance and honestly if followed might drive someone completely batty.

The first is the infamous Luke 14:26. Apologists claim that this means "Love less". However the original Greek root of the word is miseo, meaning clearly hate. The context-and other passages such as Luke 18:29, make it clear to the reader that Jesus is clearly asking his disciples to totally forsake and abandon their loved ones to embrace a life of self-denial and preaching.


Another is the concept of flesh, found mostly in the epistles. Many Christians claim that "Flesh" is mainly some spiritual inheritance from Adam-"the sin nature" if you will. However this is not really found in the text. Paul is clearly telling us that the body is totally evil and only our spirits are good, which not only is something not really present in the Old Testament(Except in the pre-flood world). It is also very similar to Greek philosophy. Interpetation of Paul's teachings even caused the Gnostic schism. However later on Paul seems to state that carnal things such as food, drink, and martial sex are OK and are gifts from God. The Paul of Romans is clearly Gnostic and asthetic; however other letters seem to show him being not-so-gnostic.
Bobzammel is offline  
Old 12-15-2002, 11:18 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: A cave. On Mars.
Posts: 36
Post

With your latter point it is important to note that Paul's later letters are actually believed to have been written by someone other than Paul - simple forgery in the name of the Church. Great.
Origian is offline  
Old 12-15-2002, 12:09 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL Reality Adventurer
Posts: 5,276
Post

I suppose they thought the lies would be excused because they were for a "good" cause.
Starboy is offline  
Old 12-15-2002, 05:21 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California
Posts: 359
Post

KJV 2 Samuel 24:1 And again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.
2 For the king said to Joab the captain of the host, which was with him, Go now through all the tribes of Israel, from Dan even to Beersheba, and number ye the people, that I may know the number of the people.
3 And Joab said unto the king, Now the LORD thy God add unto the people, how many soever they be, an hundredfold, and that the eyes of my lord the king may see it: but why doth my lord the king delight in this thing?


KJV 1 Chronicles 21:1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.
2 And David said to Joab and to the rulers of the people, Go, number Israel from Beersheba even to Dan; and bring the number of them to me, that I may know it.
3 And Joab answered, The LORD make his people an hundred times so many more as they be: but, my lord the king, are they not all my lord's servants? why then doth my lord require this thing? why will he be a cause of trespass to Israel?

Gracchus> WHO?
Gracchus is offline  
Old 12-16-2002, 01:37 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 276
Post

The Satan thing is probably a post-exilic edit. After the exile is the point where Satan evolved from Angelic prosecutor to the Father of lies. This is mainly from Zoroastarian influence. The thought of Satan as a bad guy, although it is to be found in Jewish as well as Christian traditions, is really nowhere in the OT.
Bobzammel is offline  
Old 12-17-2002, 01:34 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 392
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Bobzammel:
<strong>The Satan thing is probably a post-exilic edit. After the exile is the point where Satan evolved from Angelic prosecutor to the Father of lies. This is mainly from Zoroastarian influence. The thought of Satan as a bad guy, although it is to be found in Jewish as well as Christian traditions, is really nowhere in the OT.</strong>
Have you read the book of Job?

Regards,

Finch
Atticus_Finch is offline  
Old 12-17-2002, 01:39 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

Have you read the book of Job?

Have you? I would say the Lucifer presented in Job fits perfectly with this description. He's in Heaven, and is shown more in the role of "Angelic Prosecutor" acting on God's direction or at least in concert with God rather than as a "bad guy."
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:54 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.