FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-23-2002, 12:23 PM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Indianapolis area
Posts: 3,468
Wink

Quote:
Originally posted by scumble:
<strong>Why doesn't God post on the forum? That would be clever.</strong>
Who says I dont?
Pomp is offline  
Old 07-23-2002, 01:28 PM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Kally:
~Does the presence of suffering mean the absence of God?~
Yes. What do I win?

Quote:
MORE: Let's say you have three things- a bear, a trap, and a hunter. The bear is caught in the trap and the hunter wishes to help. In order to do that, the hunter must shoot the bear with drugs... But the bear thinks he's being attacked. Then the hunter has to push the bear's leg further into the trap in order to release it, and the bear would be convinced of his previous conclusion. But the bear is wrong. Now how do we know that we arent the bear and the hunter is not God? We wouldn't realize how God is helping us, because we are not God.


Why would a bear hunter--who set the trap initially--want to help us?

Quote:
FAITH: We have CLUES to follow for God's existance. If there were anything more or less than clues, we woudln't really be free to make a decision about God.
Clues like a talking, burning bush, for example? Or the parting of the red sea? Or the dead rising from their graves? Or a global flood?

Are those the kinds of little, insignificant clues that you are implying God is not allowed to show us above on a regular, every day basis because it would somehow effect our free will?

It was perfectly fine for God to trifurcate into flesh two thousand years ago in order to kill himself as a sacrifice to himself in order to save all of us from himself, but that was his last parlor trick? Is that what you're trying to get at?

Quote:
MORE: "If there is no God, why is there good? If there is a God, why is there so much evil?" - Augustine. If anything- such as suffering- can be judged as evil or simply "not good"- then we have some notion of an overall Good... "If there is no God, where did we get this standard of goodness by which we judge evil as evil?"
The same place we "get" every other standard humanity has ever had; from empathy/sympathy and personal experience living within a tribe/community, aka, ourselves.

It's the same place all of the simplistic lies of the christian cult came from.

Quote:
EVOLUTION: If there isnt a creator, which means no moment of creaTION, then everything's resulted from evolution.
Unless, of course, the moment of creaTION happened as a result of something like a tremendous explosion of an unstable singularity, but why muddy all of this fine back home jug talkin' with fancy book learnin'? When's the hoe down, and I ain't talkin' 'bout Ellie May?

Quote:
MORE: "If there's no beginning or 1st cause, then the universe must have always existed. That means the universe has been evolving for an infinite period of time and, by now, everything should already be perfect.
Just to chime in with everyone else, WHAT?



Quote:
MORE: There would have been plenty of time for evolution to have finished and evil to have been vanquished..."
Boy, it just never ceases to amaze me how easily ignorant people are manipulated by such profoundly stupid things.



Quote:
MORE: Christians believe in 5 things:
~God exists
~God is all-good
~God is all-powerful
~God is all-knowing
~Evil exists
Yes, and, as a child, I believed Santa Exists. What's your point?

Quote:
MORE: 1) God is all-powerful
~Can do everything meaningful and possible
Making a burning bush actually speak is not possible. Making a woman out of just a rib is not possible. Resurrecting from the dead is not possible. Flooding the entire Earth is not possible. Stopping the Sun in the sky is not possible.

Yet "he" is supposed to have done all of those things, right?

Quote:
MORE: ~Cannot make himself cease to exist
Well, then, I guess that negates the "all-powerful" claim, now doesn't it?

Quote:
MORE: ~Cannot make good evil
Why not? He made them both, didn't he? The guy can make a human out of dirt and blink the entire universe into existence, but he can't make "good" evil?

Quote:
MORE: ~Cannot make mistakes
Then why did he have to kill us all off in a global flood?

Quote:
MORE: -- You can't have free will without the possibility of evil--
And you can't have Halloween without pumpkins!

Quote:
MORE: God didn't CREATE evil, he created the POSSIBILITY of evil =]
That means absolutely nothing. Without first creating evil there would be no "possibility of" evil, yes? Are these people you got these things from capable of tying their own shoelaces yet?

Quote:
MORE: "The source of evil is not God's power, but mankind's freedom."
Created by God's power. I bet these people enjoy the merry-go-round.

Quote:
LOVE: Real love must involve a choice- a choice to love or to hate.
Must it now? I thought God was "all powerful."

Boy, that quality just keeps gettin more and more limited.

Tell me then, oh great sophist, since God is love doesn't that also mean he's hate, too?

Quote:
MORE: God created the world without sin, but with the POSSIBILITY of sin...
Then who created sin? You mean, we did? Wow, imagine that.

We created something that God didn't.

But I thought God created everything....

Quote:
MORE: It is US who's to blame for suffering because WE constantly choose TO sin...
That's right, goddamn it! God had nothing to do with it! That's why he throws us all into an eternal lake of fire for creating something that he could only manage the possibility of....

These are quite simply the stupidest arguments I've ever addressed here, but it's kind of fun.

Quote:
MORE: THe majority of our suffering in this world is due to the choices to kill, slander, be selfish, stray sexually, break promises, be recklace, etc.
That's right! Best stay at home forever mumbling in the dark your prayers to your God.

[Questionable comment deleted. -PB]

Quote:
MORE: 2) God is all-knowing
Apparently not, or he would have known all about that possibility of loophole!

The jerk!

Quote:
MORE: "God, if he is all-wise, knows not only the present but hte future. And he knows not only present good and evil but future good and evil.
How could he if he didn't create evil, just the possibility of evil...?

Quote:
MORE: If his wisdom vastly exceeds ours, as the hunter's exceeds the bear's, it is at least possible...
Yeeeessss...?

Quote:
MORE: that a loving God could deliberately tolerate horrible things like starvation because he foresees that in the long run that more people will be better and happier than if he miraculously intervened.
You mean, like he did on a constant and cataclysmic level to every single person on the planet five to two thousand years ago?

Quote:
MORE: That's at least intellectually possile."
Well, at least they spelled the word "intellectually" correctly. That's about all the points they get correct so far.[/quote]

Quote:
EXAMPLE: Death of God on the cross...
How does an all powerful God die?

I guess that just another example of him being not all that powerful, right?

Quote:
MORE: Nobody that time could see any real good in such a tragedy.
What tragedy?

Quote:
MORE: But God saw that it'd result in the opening of heaven for humans.
Did he now. He "saw" that but didn't just know that?

Quote:
MORE: THe worst tragedy brought the most wonderful event in history.
Yes, a guy died. What a wonderful event.

Quote:
MORE: "And if it happens there- if the ultimate evil can result in the ultimate good- it can happen elsewhere, even in our individual lives. Elsewhere he simply says, 'Trust me.' "
What "ultimate evil?" Don't you mean, "ultimate possibility of evil?"

Quote:
MORE: 3) God is all-good
With the possibility of evil?

Quote:
MORE: "Good" would be even MORE different between us and God than it is different between us and, say, animals. We don't always bail people out of their own, sometimes self-made problems. We don't to our child's homework for them. We don't wrap them in a protective bubble so they will never get hurt.
And we don't punish them eternally in a burning lake of fire for disobeying us.

Quote:
MORE: "Sometimes being good is NOT being kind."
There's a song in that.

Does that also mean that not being "good" is being "evil?"

Quote:
MORE: Even the ancient Greeks thought the gods taught wisdom through suffering.
And they were all homosexual pedophiles, so I guess they should know!

Quote:
MORE: "We know that moral character gets formed through hardship, through overcoming obstacles, through enduring despite difficulties." For example, courage is impossible in a world without pain.
So true, so true...

Quote:
MORE: The Apostle Paul wrote: "Suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope."
And God made a man out of dirt! With the possibility of evil...

Quote:
MORE: We learn from our mistakes.
God didn't. He committed global genocide (twice, I think, if you factor in the gap in Genesis) and still had to send himself down to kill himself as a required sacrifice by himself to himself in order to grant us the salvation from himself.

Boy, that is one heinously powerless, all-powerful being!

Ok, enough of this childish horseshit. Time to go.

[ July 24, 2002: Message edited by: Koyaanisqatsi ]</p>
Koyaanisqatsi is offline  
Old 07-23-2002, 02:05 PM   #43
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Post

Preach it Brother Koy! <img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" />
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 07-24-2002, 05:39 AM   #44
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 279
Exclamation

What's the use if Kalestia isn't replying? We all agree here!
scumble is offline  
Old 07-24-2002, 08:53 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
Question

"Use?" I was just having some fun.
Koyaanisqatsi is offline  
Old 07-24-2002, 04:20 PM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Planet Lovetron
Posts: 3,919
Post

Philosoft:

Quote:
Any argument that has premises that presume an omipotent god did something one way because there was no other way he could have done it are doomed from the outset.
I'm paraphrasing C.S. Lewis here, but if there is a best way to do something, how can omniscience fail to ascertain it, and how could omnipotence fail to implement it?

In other words, if the current state of affairs is the best one possible to ascertain God's goals, how can his omnipotence or omniscience help him past that? It is logically impossible for even Omniscience and Omnipotence to come up with a way to do something that is better than the best way.
luvluv is offline  
Old 07-24-2002, 07:10 PM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by luvluv:
<strong>

I'm paraphrasing C.S. Lewis here, but if there is a best way to do something, how can omniscience fail to ascertain it, and how could omnipotence fail to implement it?</strong>
Because now you have a standard and you have God's actions. If God created the standard, then the objection still holds because God is free to create any arbitrary standard God wishes. If God didn't create the standard, you've got much bigger philosophical problems.

<strong>
Quote:
In other words, if the current state of affairs is the best one possible to ascertain God's goals, how can his omnipotence or omniscience help him past that?</strong>
See above.

<strong>
Quote:
It is logically impossible for even Omniscience and Omnipotence to come up with a way to do something that is better than the best way.</strong>
Unless the omni- thing created the standard in the first place.
Philosoft is offline  
Old 07-25-2002, 12:15 AM   #48
HRG
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 2,406
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by luvluv:
<strong>Philosoft:



I'm paraphrasing C.S. Lewis here, but if there is a best way to do something, how can omniscience fail to ascertain it, and how could omnipotence fail to implement it?


In other words, if the current state of affairs is the best one possible to ascertain God's goals, how can his omnipotence or omniscience help him past that? It is logically impossible for even Omniscience and Omnipotence to come up with a way to do something that is better than the best way.</strong>
Coming up with it is one thing. Actually doing it is another.

HRG.
HRG is offline  
Old 07-25-2002, 01:53 AM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Kalestia:
<strong>
God didn't create evil. Let's make something clear... "evil" in the Christian sense is simply Rebellion against God. Did God create rebellion against himself? Nah, but he allowed the opportunity to exist: Free Will.

And, assuming this "God" is the God of the Christians, it would mean that he DIDN'T create us with the desire to sin.

</strong>
God created all things. Therefore he created evil (and sustains evil). And Christians believe he created human nature. Therefore , he created us with the desire to sin, just as he created us with no desire to walk around backwards on our hands and knees. He has created beings with free will that he knew would never choose evil (at least Christians assure me he did), so why not create us like that?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 07-25-2002, 01:56 AM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Kalestia:
<strong>

'If we weren't created with the desire to sin, we wouldn't sin'- not necessarily. Again, this goes back to the subject of Free Will. If we didn't have the option to sin or rebel against God, then we'd all be programmed robots to do exactly what he wanted us to do!! Now a loving God wouldn't do THAT o.o </strong>
Kalestia does not know very much about Christianity.

Christians maintain that God has created angels like Michael and Gabriel who have free will and have never sinned. Therefore, he could have created more beings like that, or only beings like that. God is more of an underachiever, than somebody evil.
Steven Carr is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.