FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-28-2002, 08:09 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: who knows
Posts: 154
Post Clarification on Metaphysical Possibility and Logical Possibility

Does referring to something as being metaphysically possible mean the same thing as to say it is logically posssible?
The Dionysian is offline  
Old 10-28-2002, 09:20 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: vancouver, bc
Posts: 30
Post

metaphysics isn't generally logical. to say that something is logically possible means that it's possiblities (varied states of potential exisences) are fundamentally circumscribed by the dictates of logic.

ghi
ghiangelo is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 06:08 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 774
Post

Hello again, II posters.

Quote:
Originally posted by TPaine:
<strong>Does referring to something as being metaphysically possible mean the same thing as to say it is logically posssible?</strong>
I suppose from a "rationalistic"(?) standpoint, one could argue that our knowledge of the basic assumptions of logic were discovered by observing things in the world. Thus every logical inference carries with it the underlying assumption that whatever is logically possible is also possible in the world. (However, I'm somewhat suspicious of that kind of argumentation.)

Well, back to the textbooks.
jpbrooks is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 10:23 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Richardson, Texas
Posts: 77
Post

From my armchair, I would say that the impossible entails the contradictory. Thus, "impossible" only applies to necessary propositions.

To say that a proposition is logically impossible is to say that it cannot possibly be true without entailing a contradiction. For example, the proposition "3 x 5 is equal to 20" is necessarily false; it is logically impossible for it to be true.

With this in mind, I would say that there is no such thing as a metaphysical impossibility (by "metaphysical" I assume we have moved into the realm of contingent propositons). The truth of the proposition "the sun will not rise tomorrow" is logically possible, even though it is contrary to our past experience.

- Skepticos
Skepticos is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 12:31 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
Post

Greetings:

Everything that is, is possible.

What is not, is not possible.

Keith.
Keith Russell is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 12:56 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Richardson, Texas
Posts: 77
Post

Keith Russell writes:

"Everything that is, is possible. What is not, is not possible."

Does your statement have something to do with the law of identity? What is, is what it is; and cannot not be what it is?

- Skepticos
Skepticos is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:23 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.