Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-28-2002, 08:09 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: who knows
Posts: 154
|
Clarification on Metaphysical Possibility and Logical Possibility
Does referring to something as being metaphysically possible mean the same thing as to say it is logically posssible?
|
10-28-2002, 09:20 PM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: vancouver, bc
Posts: 30
|
metaphysics isn't generally logical. to say that something is logically possible means that it's possiblities (varied states of potential exisences) are fundamentally circumscribed by the dictates of logic.
ghi |
10-29-2002, 06:08 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 774
|
Hello again, II posters.
Quote:
Well, back to the textbooks. |
|
10-29-2002, 10:23 AM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Richardson, Texas
Posts: 77
|
From my armchair, I would say that the impossible entails the contradictory. Thus, "impossible" only applies to necessary propositions.
To say that a proposition is logically impossible is to say that it cannot possibly be true without entailing a contradiction. For example, the proposition "3 x 5 is equal to 20" is necessarily false; it is logically impossible for it to be true. With this in mind, I would say that there is no such thing as a metaphysical impossibility (by "metaphysical" I assume we have moved into the realm of contingent propositons). The truth of the proposition "the sun will not rise tomorrow" is logically possible, even though it is contrary to our past experience. - Skepticos |
10-29-2002, 12:31 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
|
Greetings:
Everything that is, is possible. What is not, is not possible. Keith. |
10-29-2002, 12:56 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Richardson, Texas
Posts: 77
|
Keith Russell writes:
"Everything that is, is possible. What is not, is not possible." Does your statement have something to do with the law of identity? What is, is what it is; and cannot not be what it is? - Skepticos |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|