FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-08-2002, 05:48 AM   #1
raindropple
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post How should prisoners of war be treated?

Do you think that the Afghanistan prisoners of war are treated in the correct manner?

How should pow's be treated?

Atheists please answer
 
Old 08-08-2002, 07:36 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 1,827
Post

They should be kept clean and sheltered from harmful environments. They should be well fed. They should be free of debilitating torture (mental and physical).

This will maximise our ability to extract information from them, so we can go blow up their friends. When this is accomplished, any prisoner we have that was directly or to a significant degree indirectly connected to a terrorist attack on US properties and/or interests should be summarily executed. The rest should be released back into Afghanistan after we've rebuilt it into a proper democratic republic.

That's my opinion anyway. And, yes, I'm an atheist.
Feather is offline  
Old 08-08-2002, 09:04 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

While in certain situations I could tolerate torturing and executing prisoners of war, I think they should be treated like the country treats civilian prisoners.
tronvillain is offline  
Old 08-09-2002, 04:20 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London, England
Posts: 302
Post

How should pow's be treated?
If you've signed the Geneva Convention, then, ahem, according to the Geneva Convention.

Do you think that the Afghanistan prisoners of war are treated in the correct manner?
Nope. The USA signed the Geneva Convention. They're not being treated according to the Geneva Convention. QED.
Mendeh is offline  
Old 08-09-2002, 09:14 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

Mendeh
Quote:
Nope. The USA signed the Geneva Convention. They're not being treated according to the Geneva Convention. QED.
Ah, but does the Geneva Convention actually apply in this case? I mean, are the Afghani legally prisoners of war? As far as I know (I may not have been paying attention), the US hasn't actually declared war against anyone, so it's difficult to see how they could be.
tronvillain is offline  
Old 08-10-2002, 06:04 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

Atheism is a lack of belief in gods. It has no moral fallout, other than regarding morals as not god-derived. How does this entail any conclusions regarding the definition and treatment of POWs? Give us a reason to answer as atheists, and we'll answer.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 08-10-2002, 07:31 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Camelot
Posts: 290
Post

They should each be given a Gideon Bible and be forced at gunpoint to read it!
King Arthur is offline  
Old 08-10-2002, 09:33 AM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London, England
Posts: 302
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tronvillain:
<strong>Ah, but does the Geneva Convention actually apply in this case? I mean, are the Afghani legally prisoners of war? As far as I know (I may not have been paying attention), the US hasn't actually declared war against anyone, so it's difficult to see how they could be.</strong>
I can't see how the USA not publically declaring war on a country that it's quite happily been bombing the shit out of and attacking on the ground, making use of diverse wings of its own military as well as getting it's allies to join in the arse-kicking, is anything but trying to shirk, through weasel-worded legal semantics, ethical responsibilities to which it has officially pledged its support, but does not want to have the inconvenience of living up to.
Mendeh is offline  
Old 08-11-2002, 10:42 AM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: GA
Posts: 21
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by tronvillain:
<strong>While in certain situations I could tolerate torturing and executing prisoners of war, I think they should be treated like the country treats civilian prisoners.</strong>
Which situations would you deem it "appropriate" to torture and execute prisoners of war; who would have the power to decide who was tortured and who was spared; and what leverage would that leave us when our own POW's are tortured in other countries detainment camps? I personally think torture is barbaric and should not be used under most forseeable circumstances (I say most because there will always be one instance where, yes, torture might be considered a valid alternative) and that the United States should not affiliate itsself with such practices.
Montefarle is offline  
Old 08-12-2002, 03:27 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by raindropple:
<strong>How should pow's be treated?</strong>
The perceived wisdom is to dip them in 5 parts sulphate of mercury every six months, but I find a light dusting of Fisons Mildew Powder before drying under a cold frame to be a better option as it ameliorates the symptoms of leaf scab and encourages any sheep tics to ovulate prematurely. It goes without saying they should be stored in grease-proof paper off the ground.

Boro Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:43 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.