Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-23-2003, 07:26 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 1,537
|
Any religious person here who is NOT Christian?
I'm just curious...maybe a pagan, Wiccan or anyone. I just want to know how do you view "faith" (not your religion) and also to extent how do you view the "invasion" of Christianity that may threaten your religion and such. Thanks a bunch.
Corgan. |
03-23-2003, 12:45 PM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,046
|
Re: Any religious person here who is NOT Christian?
Quote:
I view faith as both good and bad. Some Christians are nice people. They should work harder to combat the *******s in their religion, though, or at least to get other views out there than the conservative fundiegelical view we see so often. |
|
03-23-2003, 03:10 PM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 438
|
I am a Buddhist and since Buddhism arrived in North American well after Christianity I guess that would make me the invader. Follow the eightfold path or die over and over and over again you pagan blood drinkers!
|
03-23-2003, 03:15 PM | #4 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 438
|
I repy to your question about faith I would say that faith is an attachment that gets in the way of the detachment we Buddhist seek in order to attain Nirvana. Faith is a tacky tourist trap on the dharma road to enlightenment.
Before enlightenment chop firewood and carry water. After enlightnement chop firewood and carry water. |
03-23-2003, 04:02 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 889
|
Hi Corgan Sow [why is that familiar to me?]
I am a Pagan. Faith is required for supernatural religions. My religion is mythological and symbolic. I have no supernatural beliefs. I am a pantheist, a polytheist, and an atheist. The material universe is all that can be said to exist and I experiance such a sense of awe of it that I have no problem thinking of it as Divine. I will always accept as valid the beliefs of others if they return that acceptance. One aspect of polytheism is social. I try not to make others uncomfortable because of what they choose to worship. I have no trouble dealing harshly with those who use their faith as though it were a free pass to truth. I am utterly devoted to the Goddess Inanna. I understand her to be metaphorical. That in no way lessens my devotion to her. There is no evidence that she or any other deities exist. I believe that anyone who is not having fun with religion needs to find another one. JT |
03-23-2003, 04:37 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
|
I'm a Wiccan on my way to my First Degree initiation....
"Faith" encompasses all the things I believe, but have only personal proof for (anecdotes, etc). Therefore, I don't expect anyone else to believe me (although I appreciate it when people humor me). I try to only "talk shop" with people who share similar frames of reference; otherwise I fall into one of two patterns: (A) "This happened." "No it didn't." "Did so!" "Prove it!" "All my proof is anecdotal" "It didn't happen, then!" "Did so happen!" ad infinitum (B) "I don't believe in your god." "My god's real, yours isn't!" "Nuh-uh!" "Prove your god's real!" "Prove YOUR god's real!" "I asked you first!" ad naseum Thus, I don't bring it up if I can help it (unless directly asked). As for Christianity, I have a large number of unresolved anger issues directed at Christianity. I'm working on it. |
03-23-2003, 05:26 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 1,537
|
Ah, another question. What differentiate between you folks who have "faith", and skeptics? Sometimes I find that "faith" really works wonders in more than one religion that I know.
|
03-23-2003, 05:42 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
|
I dunno.
Skeptics won't believe something without objective proof, while I believe things on only personal, subjective proof? Like, if I said I was 80 years old, a skeptic wouldn't believe me until I had proven it. I'd believe me because I'd have 80 years worth of anecdotes... but if I'd somehow lost my birth certificate, all my proof would be subjective. So a skeptic wouldn't believe me... and I wouldn't blame them for not believing me. |
03-23-2003, 10:08 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 889
|
Quote:
As for Christianity, been there, working on it too JT |
|
03-23-2003, 10:13 PM | #10 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: BF, Texas
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
On the other hand, if you said you were 8 years old, I'd need at least some persuading. If you said you were 800 years old I flatly wouldn't believe you without extensive proof. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|