Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-28-2002, 08:14 AM | #11 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Quote:
|
|
06-28-2002, 08:21 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 1,924
|
Quote:
"First they came for the Muslims, And I did not speak up because I was not a Muslim, Then they came for the atheists, And I did not speak up because I was not an athesit..." I am putting Muslims first, because it seems that a Muslim can be held without charge already, while being an atheist merely makes you a bad person. (Now that I have that phrasing there, didn't Bush refer to Padilla as a "bad man"?) Simian |
|
06-28-2002, 08:39 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 932
|
I was happy to see my paper (Houston Chronicle) despite it's ordinarily slight conservative bent, printed quite a few cogent "pro-decision" letters. Their own editoral agains the decision was muted, and based (unsuprisingly) on the "what's it gonna harm" argument.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|