FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2002, 08:14 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Arrowman:
<strong>
I'm hoping that some liberal Christians can be persuaded to express themselves in public also.</strong>
I sometimes wonder where such guys run off to at times like this -- I wonder why they are such cowards. If some fundie theocracy sends them to "re-education camps" for denying "true Christianity", will they then wake up to what has been happening to them? Or will they meekly go along and brag about how they deserved their punishment?
lpetrich is offline  
Old 06-28-2002, 08:21 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 1,924
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by lpetrich:
<strong>

I sometimes wonder where such guys run off to at times like this -- I wonder why they are such cowards. If some fundie theocracy sends them to "re-education camps" for denying "true Christianity", will they then wake up to what has been happening to them? Or will they meekly go along and brag about how they deserved their punishment?</strong>
I hope they speak up before they have to write poetry like:

"First they came for the Muslims,
And I did not speak up because I was not a Muslim,
Then they came for the atheists,
And I did not speak up because I was not an athesit..."

I am putting Muslims first, because it seems that a Muslim can be held without charge already, while being an atheist merely makes you a bad person. (Now that I have that phrasing there, didn't Bush refer to Padilla as a "bad man"?)

Simian
simian is offline  
Old 06-28-2002, 08:39 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 932
Post

I was happy to see my paper (Houston Chronicle) despite it's ordinarily slight conservative bent, printed quite a few cogent "pro-decision" letters. Their own editoral agains the decision was muted, and based (unsuprisingly) on the "what's it gonna harm" argument.
Morat is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:07 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.