Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-27-2002, 09:32 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: California
Posts: 6,196
|
Today's opinion section derails court ruiling
<a href="http://www.bakersfield.com/opinion/story/1321774p-1440726c.html" target="_blank">Oh, look at all the lies.</a>
|
06-27-2002, 09:41 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,358
|
..starting with the headline "It's unanimous! Readers don't like 'Pledge' ruling"
Did they somehow overlook one Gerald E. Leapley? Or did they not understand the point of his letter? I suspect the latter |
06-27-2002, 09:48 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
|
Show up at church
I just wish that even a quarter of those folks who are so almighty upset by the (possible) deletion of the phrase, "under God," from the Pledge of Allegiance, would bother to show up for church on Sunday mornings. ANGUS BOWER, Frazier Park |
06-27-2002, 10:09 PM | #4 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
good letter: Quote:
|
||
06-27-2002, 10:12 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,358
|
What bothers me is that the great majority of the tinoy minority (if you follow) of letters supporting the decision, will be from atheists - which will just reinforce the misconception that this is entirely an atheist vs Christian issue.
I'm hoping that some liberal Christians can be persuaded to express themselves in public also. |
06-28-2002, 04:15 AM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,198
|
Happily, <a href="http://www.freep.com/voices/letters/elets28_20020628.htm" target="_blank">the Detroit Free Press recieved, and printed, a number of pro-decision letters</a>. Not mine, but then, mine was a little lengthy .
--W@L |
06-28-2002, 05:13 AM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,597
|
Quote:
Perhaps the Baptist Joint Committee will issue a press release soon. They are usually quite supportive of church/state separation. I'd certainly like to see them (or another religious organization) publish a statement in favor of the decision. Bill [ June 28, 2002: Message edited by: Bill Snedden ]</p> |
|
06-28-2002, 06:06 AM | #8 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cloudy Water
Posts: 443
|
Quote:
1: 9th is just kidding 2: 9th is stupid ("a disgrace to God") 1: Slippery-slope 1: Pledge of Allegiance is Constitutional, removing it is not (sounds like a Creationist) 1: 9th is correct 1: God exists. Therefore, God exists. 1: Who cares about the Constitution? Christianity is the majority! 1: Show up at church 1: If you don't like it, don't say it (ignore the peer pressure!) Hum harrum... everyone's got a different reason, apparently. From Freep: Quote:
[ June 28, 2002: Message edited by: ashibaka ]</p> |
||
06-28-2002, 06:18 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
|
Where are the Episcopalians? And do everybody understand that it was the (RC) Knights of Columbus (who love dressing-up in fancy costumes & Swords?) who spent a lot of money back in the 1950s to get those two dirty words added in to the Pledge -- wh/ by the way is a NOTHING document to begin w/. If I were presently the parent of a school-aged child .. but I'm not. I wonder if my [also 1st-born} nephew has explained all-this to his only kid, my also 1st-born grandnephew? Have to ask. And I wonder what my first-born early-pubertal grandchild thinks about all this? Have to ask.
|
06-28-2002, 07:01 AM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|