FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-31-2002, 11:44 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Almaden, California
Posts: 917
Post NASA to spend $15+K to fight 'twinkies'

An article in the SJ Mercury News reports that NASA is going to fight the conspiracy theorists who say that the moon landings didn't happen.

Sonoma State astronomy professor Phil Plait says "It's a real shame that it has to be done. It's beneath NASA's dignity to give these twinkies the time of day."

Prof. Plait runs the Bad Astronomy website which debunks space myths at <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com" target="_blank">http://www.badastronomy.com</a>

The article states that in 1999, a poll found that 11% of Americans doubted the moon landings. After the Fox network put on a show, "Conspiracy Theory: Did We Really Land on the Moon?" last year, the number of ignorami(my term)increased to 20%.The article doesn't say who conducted the poll.

NASA has hired a former aerospace engineer, James Oberg, to counter the skeptics. I'm going to e-mail the Fox network and ask them to televise Mr. Oberg's rebuttal, in the name of balanced programming.

Gilly
gilly54 is offline  
Old 10-31-2002, 07:58 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

Why spend all that money when all they need do do is hire the strong right arm of Buzz Aldrin?

His anti-conspiracy skills pack a <a href="http://iidb.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=57&t=000508" target="_blank">punch.</a>
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 10-31-2002, 08:22 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ...
Posts: 2,191
Smile

Quote:
Originally posted by Doubting Didymus:
<strong>Why spend all that money when all they need do do is hire the strong right arm of Buzz Aldrin?

His anti-conspiracy skills pack a <a href="http://iidb.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=57&t=000508" target="_blank">punch.</a></strong>
LOL. That was a great punch, go Aldrin!
Krieger is offline  
Old 11-01-2002, 08:17 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Almaden, California
Posts: 917
Post

What is so irrational and incongruous is that these conspiracy nuts don't extend their skepticism to their God-belief. <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" />
gilly54 is offline  
Old 11-01-2002, 09:05 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL Reality Adventurer
Posts: 5,276
Post

Why not just send another man to the moon and take one of the ignorami and leave him/her there. Leave a months worth of food, water and air and a radio with which to talk to earth. That should settle it once and for all and take a moron out of the gene pool.

Starboy
Starboy is offline  
Old 11-01-2002, 04:31 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK (London)
Posts: 103
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by gilly54:
<strong>What is so irrational and incongruous is that these conspiracy nuts don't extend their skepticism to their God-belief. <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> </strong>
But they doing EXACTLY what they do with religion, believing what they are told as gospel without asking questions rather than

a/ not really caring either way
or
b/ Discounting the evidence as too weak or full of holes
or
b/ Doing a bit of research

Poeple tend to be lazy and gullible, its easier to believe what you are told than use your brain to question it JUST like Theists

Age

[ November 01, 2002: Message edited by: ageofreason2000 ]</p>
ageofreason2000 is offline  
Old 11-07-2002, 12:15 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sunny FLA USA
Posts: 212
Post

This discussion would be incomplete without this link!! Go Buzz Aldrin!

<a href="http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_668415.html" target="_blank">Aldrin punches Skeptic</a>
Vesica is offline  
Old 11-07-2002, 01:35 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Post

My question is this: if the overwhelming evidence that already exists out there in the form of NASA photos, NASA employee (including astronauts!) personal accounts, moon rocks, etc. doesn't convince the conspiracy theorists, what can NASA do now that will convince them?!? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 11-07-2002, 06:10 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,125
Post

LOL, they don't understand that conspiracy theories are as immune to counter-evidence as religion is!

You just know that the kooks are now convinced that the government is in "damage control mode" with this initiative, thus proving them right after all!

<img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" />
Bible Humper is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 06:30 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Post

Yeah, so in my opinion a better way for NASA to spend $15+K is to fund a graduate student for a year.
Shadowy Man is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:00 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.