Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-21-2003, 09:13 AM | #1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
|
WV Board rejects IDiots and Creationists
From here:
Quote:
|
|
02-21-2003, 09:39 AM | #2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western U.S.A.
Posts: 293
|
This is encouraging but I am dubious about writing off ID'ers as a fringe. As long as they can keep chipping away at science standards from a political angle, how long can they be kept at bay? If you were to poll the U.S. Congress today I would be very surprised if even half of them would profess a belief in evolution, or would agree that ID/creationism should not be taught in public schools. Bush I have heard is for equal time, and our next Chief Justice (Scalia) dissented on a court decision against creationism, did he not?
|
02-21-2003, 10:47 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melrose, MA
Posts: 961
|
This is the most progressive thing West Virginia has done since they broke away from Virginia in 1861.
Good for them! |
02-21-2003, 10:54 AM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
|
Quote:
|
|
02-21-2003, 11:06 AM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
I guess if she's taught about evolution, Mary Lynn will become a baby-killing crack whore. Gregg |
|
02-21-2003, 11:21 AM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
There's no question, though, that ID is the biggest threat to quality science education out there. IDists like John Calvert (who I've exchanged an e-mail or two with, he's based right across the state line in Kansas) are sneaky and have no shame, and they've learned how to present their case using convoluted legal and philosophical smoke screens that obscure the fact that they have no positive evidence whatsoever for ID. They will be tough to defeat. On the other hand, they've become so unabashedly sleazy and lawyer-like in their methods that I think they're starting to turn a lot of people off. Gregg |
|
02-21-2003, 11:23 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Narcisco, RRR
Posts: 527
|
Quote:
I couldn't help thinking about the Windsors at that moment. KC |
|
02-21-2003, 11:35 AM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
|
The Windsors don't act like kings (apart from the Queen, who has an excuse), most of them seem to act like idiots.
|
02-21-2003, 01:26 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Narcisco, RRR
Posts: 527
|
Quote:
KC |
|
02-21-2003, 02:02 PM | #10 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western U.S.A.
Posts: 293
|
The whole idea of "if we are descended from apes then we are no more than apes" is so silly it barely deserves comment. Of course we are different from our ape ancestors (yeah, I know strictly speaking we are apes, but you get my point)... the whole point of evolution is that populations acquire different characteristics and capabilities over time. I mean you might as well say that "if we are descended from bacteria then we are no more than bacteria." Whoops! Guess I'd better stop playing the piano, because bacteria can't play the piano.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|