Kosh

I would like to personally thank Randman for
what he has been doing here.

IMHO, some of the best information on evidence for
Evolution has been presented here in response
to Randman's moronic ramblings.

Randman, you have done more to further the truth
of evolution and to show how moronic YEC, ID, or
any creation theory is, than any of us could.

In addition, you've proven to be a first class
example of why southern bible belters should not
be allowed to reproduce.

MODERATOR: please lock down this thread.

Thanks.

Someone7

Now now Kosh, don't scare him off...

Daggah

At this point I see nothing wrong with chasing the little troll off.

randman

Well, Daggah when the Mod has to help you by locking my threads, I think it is safe to say you were getting your butt whipped.
The Mod had to help you put by locking down my threads on the fossil record while trying to steer the conversation into genetics, which Phlebas knows I know little about, and he does with personal insults while allowing ya'll to lamely dogge the substance of nearly every post of mine, you don't have to worry.
I doubt I will be back after tonight, not even to read your lame responses.
This has been educational, and believe me, ya'll are one weird and twisted bunch over here, but why argue it.
Even if evolution was true, I wouldn't want such people as many here teaching anyone. The scholarship level in dealing with critics is on the level of mere propoganda.
There have been a few, a very few, good posts, and I think I acknowedged them all.
Thanks for anyone that pointed out any errors that were errors indeed of the articles I linked.
Too bad, not more of you are decent sorts intellectually.

Daggah

As a mod myself, this is absolute BULLSHIT. Your threads are NOT BEING LOCKED. They are being MOVED to more appropriate forums. You are not whipping anyone's butt with your out-of-context quotes, kid, so don't sit there fooling yourself.

Pot, kettle, BLACK. Again, your threads are not being LOCKED.

Finally, I've never yet dealt with someone as hard-headed as you are.

Oh, the irony...

Yes, shame on us for daring to point out misquotes and dishonesty on your part when you resort to it. This would be funny if it weren't so frustrating, especially to see a creationist resort to using YEC websites like AiG and ICR and then accuse the other side of "propaganda." That's just rich.

You mean, like the cytochrome C sequences, human/chimp/gorilla/orangutan DNA comparison, and discussion of similiarities in junk DNA that you COMPLETELY and UTTERLY dodged?

randman

Uh, you dodhed repeatedly the quotes which are not taken out of context, and I have included the context of the quotes yet you dare say I dodged a thread which I had no interest in but humored the poster who rudely demanded I post, and in which the Mod did lock the threads until, according to the Phlebas, I answer your lame thread.
I didn't come on here to debate areas that I have not studied. I came on here to talk about the areas that i have studied, areas which you and others are in utter denial over.
Funny, but if you didn't lie and stonewall so much over the quotes on the fossil record, you would be much more persuasive. As it is, I can only assume you do because of an inherent weakness in your approach to evolution, and seeing as this intellectual deficiency is widespread, I must assume that evolutionary dogma is just that unproven dogma.

S2Focus

I think that you've gone a bit overboard with your suggestion here -- outlawing cousin-marriages would pretty much accomplish the same thing...

Silent Dave

Randman, I don't believe there is a single person here, with the possible exception of yourself, whom you are fooling. You have given us arguments, we have answered them, and you proceed as if we have not. I took the time to personally check each of your 154 (to date) posts, and not a single one of them poses even the slightest threat to evolution. Nor do any of them put you in danger of being mistaken for someone with intellectual integrity who knows what evolution is.

That you are an absolutely pathetic excuse for a human being is merely my own subjective opinion, but that you are an absolutely pathetic excuse for a scholar is universally agreed upon. But those are both your problems -- we will not make them ours. Personally, I fail to see how you reconcile your actions of the last week with the Ninth Commandment . . . but then again, the sound of the anti-evolutionists' hypocrisy is like the sound of the surf, or the air conditioner in a hot building -- you only notice it when it stops.

When you are ready to tell us about the biological or genetic mechanism which prevents variation between "kinds" of species, do tell us. Until then, you're just another evolutionist in denial.


Dave

lpetrich

I wonder what, if anything, Randman thinks about biogeography. Creationists tend to avoid biogeography, as if they instinctively know that it is an embarrassment for them.

Let's see him explain the distinctive fauna and flora of many oceanic islands -- species found nowhere else on this planet, but most closely related to nearby-mainland species.

And let's see him explain why some islands have giant turtles, and also why no islands have giant rats.