Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-10-2002, 07:26 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 215
|
advice to randman from his favorite website
Someone on the talk.origins newsgroup post a link to an Answers In Genesis article about what creationist arguements not to use.
<a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/Home/Area/faq/dont_use.asp" target="_blank">http://www.answersingenesis.org/Home/Area/faq/dont_use.asp</a> [ March 10, 2002: Message edited by: l-bow ]</p> |
03-11-2002, 07:03 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
bump
|
03-11-2002, 08:21 AM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 215
|
There is one saying not to use the "there are no transitionals" argument.
|
03-11-2002, 09:06 AM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
|
I actually managed to read through most of the crap on that link and my mouth is just gaping wide open.
Just unbelievable. I particularly enjoyed the age of dinosaurs reidirection, mentioning nothing at all about how deep in the Earth the bones were found indicating their age. Instead, it just focuses on fossilization and mineralization as if those were the primary means to establish a fossil's age. The best, though, is the nonsense about Noah's Ark and how Noah took with him young or infant dinosaurs and that explains how he was able to fit them on the ark! After all, we all know the great story about how Moses pulled the thorn out of the T. Rex's paw and they became great friends, right? Leviticus 10:12, I think. It's just astounding what lengths cult members go to in order to keep their sheep pigassed ignorant fools. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|