FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-04-2003, 01:50 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Default

Writer@Large:
Quote:
Actually, tk has made the biggest point here with his "if I move around the Earth" scenario, and found the flaw in notMichaelJackson's OP. The Sun does not "rise," nor does it "set;" rising and setting are a matter of fixed perspective from here on Earth, as we percieve the planet's axil rotation. What notMichaelJackson *should* have asked is "prove that the Earth will continue its rotation around its axis for the next 24 hours." And that, of course, has loads of astronomical observation, geophysical calculation, and other good science to back it up.
As the words are normally used the sun does "rise" and it does "set", though providing evidence that it will rise tommorow would presumably involve the more detailed perspective. Still, the simple knowldege that the sun always has risen is evidence that it will rise tommorow, even if you are not aware of the mechanism.
tronvillain is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.