Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-01-2002, 12:24 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
Information wanted: Athesists can't testify
Does anybody happen to know what states still have laws on the books prohibiting atheists from serving on juries, testifying, or holding public office?
|
07-01-2002, 12:44 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,834
|
I can tell you that none of those that remain are valid.
|
07-01-2002, 05:41 PM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Quote:
|
|
07-01-2002, 06:15 PM | #4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York CIty/USA
Posts: 4
|
I wish I knew,
but I can tell you in New York city, but, as a juror, I was not asked to swear to god... I do not remember what the exact oath was, but I was shocked that it did not include 'god'. I allways think it is humorous. I do not believe in god, so if I have an oath taht I swear too god that I will tell the truth, I will feel free to lie. |
07-01-2002, 06:23 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,587
|
In Texas you have to believe in a Supreme Being in order to run for office. It's never invoked so it's never been overturned. I think 10 or so states have similiar clauses in their state's constitution.
|
07-01-2002, 08:03 PM | #6 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Posts: 126
|
Quote:
Thus all laws requiring an oath (affirmation is the alternative) or a religious statement, are void. In any state in the Union, you can ask to affirm instead of swear and you don't have to mention "God". If this right is denied, the validity of any verdict is automatically appealable. Jack |
|
07-01-2002, 09:33 PM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
|
Quote:
|
|
07-01-2002, 10:55 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ...
Posts: 2,191
|
Quote:
[ July 01, 2002: Message edited by: Krieger ]</p> |
|
07-02-2002, 09:32 AM | #9 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 210
|
Try this page:
<a href="http://users2.ev1.net/~turton/constitution.htm" target="_blank">State Constitutions Requiring Faith</a> This site spells it all out. Now, most people would insist that the states would have a tough time enforcing their anti-atheist laws, but that doesn't change the fact that they're still on the books. It's shocking, really. |
07-03-2002, 05:08 AM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
|
SUPREMES's decision [= stare decisis] (I know not date nor the relevant ID numbers offhand >>>> Stephen Maturin?); case of *Torquaso* [sp?] unConstitutionalling once-for-all any religious test for public office.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|