FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-25-2002, 08:23 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus_Finch:
The question of "old light" is a tough one for the "young earth" theory.
It sure is.

Quote:
I am not aware of a fully satisfactory theory to explain that problem.
I am aware of one: It isn't a problem. It's only a problem for those that see an arbitrary need to twist empirical evidence to suit literal interpretations of ancient mythology (the substance of my original question).

Quote:
It therefore fits into the "we don't know that yet" category.
Notice that, in this case, it is the creationists that must say, "We don't know that," not the legitimate scientific commmunity, which "knows" that these objects are in fact hundreds of millions of light years away, and in the meantime has moved well beyond this rather trivial observation.

Quote:
I must note, however, that evolutionary and materialist theories also include a great deal of "we don't know that yet" answers as well (i.e. how exactly did we go from no life to life, the first and all important step in evolutionary theory).
Naturally. However in this case, as I said above, it's the creationists that "don't know that," and they really have no reason not to "know that," save for clinging arbitrarily to a literal interpretation of ancient creation myths.

This is what I was suggesting about your original statement concerning evidence. Creationists necessarily (and needlessly) create two different standards of evidence, and thereby a pointless and ultimately tedious struggle between the two.
hezekiah jones is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 08:31 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,311
Post

Well, I believe that Mr. Finch has been sufficiently welcomed here in this forum, however, as this seems like an excellent discussion, I will move it to Miscellaneous Religion.
AspenMama is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 09:03 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus_Finch:
<strong>I am extremely interested to know the literal interpretation of genesis was disproven generations ago. Please explain.
</strong>
Come to the evo/cre forum, <a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=forum&f=58" target="_blank">http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=forum&f=58</a> and start a thread requesting such.

Also visit, <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org" target="_blank">www.talkorigins.org</a> there is a lot of stuff for you to read.

-RvFvS

[ March 25, 2002: Message edited by: RufusAtticus ]</p>
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 09:14 AM   #44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Everywhere I go. Yes, even there.
Posts: 607
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus_Finch:
<strong>I believe the evidence for the Christian faith is strong. I do not suppose that it is beyond question or reasoned disbelief.</strong>
Disbelief is, as you seem to allow here, a reasonable option - more reasonable than belief, as we infidels look at it.

We include, in addition to the common, everyday armchair philosopher, some legal, academic, and scientific professionals willing to sharpen their iron against yours - not to mention a number of former ministers, most from theologically conservative churches. After much reflection, we (I'm one of the former ministers) accepted that the 'strong evidence' put forward by apologetics was in fact not compelling enough to justify belief any longer, and to maintain integrity, we had to leave the Christian religion.

It will be a priority of ours to show you why we are convinced of this. Hopefully in the process, you can demolish some stereotypes for us. We welcome and encourage your contributions here.

-Wanderer
David Bowden is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 10:34 AM   #45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nashville, USA
Posts: 949
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally posted by tony anciano:
<strong>Regarding what Mojo Mojo described as "Blasphemer", It might be a good idea for Atticus F. to explain what he meant by bible authority and evolution can be reconciled in a person. That's a stupendous statement.</strong>
No, according to acceptable christian doctrine, it's heretical and outright blasphemy.

Which is why I find it all BS!
MOJO-JOJO is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 11:19 AM   #46
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Execution State, USA
Posts: 5,031
Post

&lt;tracks down Atticus_Finch and sprays him with warm beer&gt;
The Naked Mage is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 12:49 PM   #47
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Charlotte,NC USA
Posts: 379
Post

Dont forget to visit us in the basement, during your stay here.
The basement is where they keep me locked up.
They figure I cant do much damage down there,
you know with all the slobbering, and cursing,
and serious mental impairment.

Once in a while they let me out, but they are always watching me.....everywhere I go....always watching...I know they are there, they cant fool me....
Wolf <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
sighhswolf is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 08:40 PM   #48
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ny
Posts: 27
Post

Welcome and Merry Meet....... So how do you feel about witches????


This may be an interesting venture.


"they bade me welcome and in i went
to drink thier wine to my heart's content.
I danced and laughed with gents fair.
Ne'er in my life had i such cheer;
Grasses in the wind are waving."
Merry Meet and Merry Part again.

Minnie_kitty
minnie_kitty is offline  
Old 03-26-2002, 01:42 AM   #49
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus_Finch:
<strong>
... I must note, however, that evolutionary and materialist theories also include a great deal of "we don't know that yet" answers as well (i.e. how exactly did we go from no life to life, the first and all important step in evolutionary theory).
</strong>
What's implied here is "The God of the Gaps", and I'm not impressed.

For all we know, the early Earth could have been seeded with some microbes by some extraterrestrial visitors who had traveled from the future.

Imagine some spacefarers trying to guarantee that they will exist by filling vials with microbes and dropping them onto desolate planets in the far past.
lpetrich is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.