Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-10-2002, 06:28 AM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 6,980
|
Quote:
As for the patent thing...well, that is just hypothesis as to why no one ever used it, due to its huge advantage in savings in gas. |
|
12-10-2002, 07:11 AM | #12 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
100 mpg carbuerator, everlasting lightbulb...two I remember from my younger days.
These and several other "inventions that were covered up by the [oil/power/etc.] company" are nothing more than urban legends, as is the water-burning car. |
12-10-2002, 07:18 AM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
What he's referring to is an engine that was designed to only be (essentially) one-stroke, meaning that there is a huge power saving, thus being much more fuel efficient. The oil/auto companies bought the patents up and never let it see the light of day.
Umm, if this was in the '60s, the patents would have expired at least 10 years ago. One-stroke engines have been around a long time. <a href="http://user.tninet.se/~zyo199o/cgp.htm" target="_blank">100-year-old one-stroke engine</a> The <a href="http://www.tsgc.utexas.edu/tadp/1996/general/stirling.html" target="_blank">Stirling</a> engine is quite fascinating, though not technically a one-stroke, and its basic design was conceived decades before the "classic" internal combustion engine. [ December 10, 2002: Message edited by: Mageth ]</p> |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|