Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-14-2002, 10:26 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A place in the Northern Hemisphere of Planet Earth
Posts: 1,250
|
Shroud of Turin?
What do you think of this ancient relic? Is it real or a fake? I was just watching Unsolved Mysteries and they had a segment on the shroud. They had a forensic anthropologist explain the shroud. She said ti could be made using a special kind of bursh and paints and she made it herself and it matched the replica. but, I still don't get how the bloodstains got on the shoroud. Because, I read somewhere that scientists tested the blood and they found it was real blood. I stil have no idea what to think of the shroud. But, I'm leaning more towards fake. What about you guys?
|
06-14-2002, 10:30 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 625
|
It's fake, fake, fake. Even carbon-dating testing showed it was made in the Middle Ages.
|
06-15-2002, 05:28 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Roanoke, VA, USA
Posts: 2,646
|
Oh Great! Not another Shroud of Turin thread!
Leonarde? Where are you? <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> NPM |
06-15-2002, 08:02 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,315
|
Some reading for you:
<a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=50&t=000148&p=" target="_blank">http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=50&t=000148&p=</a> And if you still want more: <a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=45&t=000441&p=" target="_blank">http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=45&t=000441&p=</a> |
06-15-2002, 08:52 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Los Angeles Area
Posts: 1,372
|
It's actually someone's jizz rag. Eww.
|
06-15-2002, 09:36 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
|
The shroud may be real, or it may be fake. However, the shroud is completely irrelevant in that it in no way, shape, or form proves the existence of any supernatural entity.
Sincerely, Goliath |
06-15-2002, 10:20 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 699
|
Quote:
|
|
06-16-2002, 05:17 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 590
|
The shroud is an obvious forgery.
If it was real it would have wrapped around the body and head and it would not give us a simple front view of a face but it would display all sides of the body creating what I would call the Alfred E Newman effect. The Image would be disturbing and strange but it would have had at least a semblance of credibility. We would see both ears, face and the back of the head in a single image. Cubism hadn't been invented yet so the forger from the Middle ages could only create a rather conventional front and back view but could not give us the kind of image that would have been created by a bloody body wrapped in a shroud. |
06-16-2002, 05:50 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,898
|
The Vatican pronounced the shroud to be a 14th century pious fraud decades ago. Why anyone would want to think it evidence of anything other than that, I cannot fathom.
|
06-16-2002, 11:48 AM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North America
Posts: 1,603
|
Let me just say that the links recommended by
Tercel say it all: not just about authenticity but about the level of knowledge here at II: a profound thinker by the name of Koy let us know the true lowdown on the INFAMOUS S of Turin. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|