Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-28-2003, 12:23 PM | #71 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm glad to hear that it is sometimes easy. How about a demonstration of this ability? Pretty please? You can ask for any information you need. I would let you use me as a test subject, but I already told you my birthday. Any volunteers? Of course, the volunteer would have to divulge their birthday to a third party before we begin, to keep things honest. I can't wait. Patrick |
||
04-28-2003, 12:54 PM | #72 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ps418
hyzer has ask:" Can you prepare charts for someone who does not know their exact time of birth ?". Ask your mother. She know's the time. If not. It is filed. Thank you and Good Night. |
04-28-2003, 01:04 PM | #73 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
|
Quote:
You almost seem offended by the fact that someone would require proof of your claims in order to accept them. How about you suggest a test that would help validate the science of astrology. We can get input as to the parameters of the test. Then we can apply it. How does that sound to you? |
|
04-28-2003, 01:32 PM | #74 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
"If you have followed this thread and checked, then you can recognize, that that, what I have presented on astrological interpretations was right. I do name here the terms 'missed father', 'cut relationships', 'Tourettte's syndrom' , all provable data to measure significance." Astrology is not a game, its a weapon. The personal Character of a human is to be respected as private and not a subject of discussion boards in the public. I have given several times the advice to read an interpretation made by an astrologer or by an astrology service to decide your self about its relevance. AFAIK you can read a short discription of your chart for free on http://www.astro.com/h/index_e.htm?l...nc-u1049477315, but a paid detailed description is best to comperate the text with own imagination of the self. Volker |
|
04-28-2003, 01:34 PM | #75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
|
|
04-28-2003, 01:43 PM | #76 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 1,844
|
still looking
Somewhere on the ‘net I read a tome (well, a thorough debunking) of astrology that included calculations that showed that the gravitational pull exerted by the average 180 lbs obstetrician on a baby at the moment of birth is greater than the gravitational pull exerted by any planet in our solar system other than Earth. Wish I could find it.
Volker - you say it is not gravity but some unknown force? How do you measure it? |
04-28-2003, 02:51 PM | #77 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Re: still looking
Quote:
If a character of a human is not a hoax, then this charcater is a real part of nature. You do not can bring back the character of your son , if this is not matching your imaginations. Science has rejected the order of spiritual qualities, and I think this is an error. The same causality as in physics is to be recognize in spirtual actions from a character. Astrology is the only science, which is able to handle such order. How science can solve a character of Sadam Hussein with quantum mechanics? Science is isolated from ethics and spirtual qualities. As light has a phase, an energy, an amplitude and a polarization, natur has a physical part and a spirtual part. If one is rejecting the property of amplitude of light, this lacks in understanding the nature of light. And if one is rejecting the spirtual part of nature, which scientists proceed each evening at home, then this lacks in the understanding of nature too. That spirtuality is not to prove with Popper is not the problem of nature, it is the problem of the bondage to Popper. Because spirituality is only to recognize, but not can be proved, doesn't mean, that each spiritual argument must be put in the can. He who can recognize the truth is free from proof. And dimensions like justice or love is not a dimension in physics. Physicists or scientist are not competent to announce ethical claims. They are handcapped by their 4 forces and know nothing about spiritual causal orders. Least of all they have no knowledge about their causal 'where from' or their own self. From this nothing they claim the power to rule the world. Volker |
|
04-28-2003, 03:44 PM | #78 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What I am proposing is developing a way to demonstrate the science you say is associated with astrology. |
|||
04-28-2003, 04:06 PM | #79 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
|
Quote:
Please provide some specific predictions of imminent events which we can scientifically validate (since you are claiming astrology is scientific). Surely you are aware how much damage your ongoing failure does to your claim ? |
|
04-28-2003, 11:49 PM | #80 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
That's the difference between arrogant science claims and an individual recognition. Your claim has no scientific base, it is trash. Show me, by proof, that your scientific claim is absolute true. Volker |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|