FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-20-2002, 09:07 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Posts: 666
Post More Wit and Wisdom Courtesy of BB

In spite of my private vow not to lurk at BB in the wake of the great atheist purge, I had a moment of weakness just now. Sure enough, our favorite creationist "expert" is at it again:

<a href="http://www.baptistboard.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=36;t=000162" target="_blank">www.baptistboard.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=36;t=000162</a>

(Sorry, I still haven't figured out how to link to things without typing the entire address.)

Helen's screed is blatantly wrong on so many levels that I will content myself with simply posting it here and letting others reach their own conclusions. Have fun.
Darwin's Finch is offline  
Old 06-20-2002, 09:58 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Darwin's Finch:
(Sorry, I still haven't figured out how to link to things without typing the entire address.)
To put in a link, do the following:

When making a post, click on the "URL button" below, under the "Instant UBB Code" bar.

Type in, or copy and paste from browser, the web address (if you are pasting, make sure it copies over the http:// that appears there already, so there isn't two of them)

Hit "Ok"

Type in what you want to be hyperlinked (i.e. "Helen's last post")

Hit "Ok"

This link will now appear at the end of your post, even if your cursor was somewhere in the middle.

scigirl

(I'll have to look at that later - I'm at work and don't have a lot of time right now, but Helen's stuff was pretty easy to pick apart before, IIRC)
scigirl is offline  
Old 06-20-2002, 11:57 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Post

Ok here we go:

Quote:
Helen:
1. If evolution is true, then how we think is programmed into us. Our very thought processes are matters of evolutionary development and should just be accepted as such. I am religious because I was ‘wired’ to be religious. Atheists are ‘wired’ to be atheists, etc. Therefore what creationists believe should simply be accepted as part of their evolutionary development.
How we think is programmed into us? Where does evolutionary theory say that??

Quote:
Helen:
2. It has been said consistently by evolutionists that science is not interested in truth; truth is metaphysical and does not belong in the realm of science. Science is looking for the natural, material explanation for things, and I can only conclude that they are looking for these explanations whether or not they are true! Therefore, my concern with the truth, as a creationist, should not bother them at all, for it is outside their concern. The other way of looking at this point, from their direction, is that since truth is not an issue, one untruth is as good as another ethically, so creationism is no big deal.
This is the third time this week I've heard YECS whine about how evil evolutionists look for natural explanations. Why don't they go harass medical researchers for looking for natural explanations for diabetes and heart disease instead of assuming it's satan. I certainly hope that Helen hates the NIH as much as she hates evolutionary biologists!! (she probably does though, those evil scientist bastards, who try to find natural causes for disease in order to CURE THEM)

And scientists are interested in the truth. I think she is confusing real scientists with Indiana Jones:
Quote:
Said by Indy in the 3rd movie:
Archaeology is the search for fact. If it's truth you're looking for, try the philosophy class down the hall.


Fact is, "fact" and "truth" are not easily definable terms, and science does indeed search, and find, truth.

Quote:
Helen:
3. Since our thought processes are results of evolutionary development, which in its turn is dependant on time and chance, there is no guarantee that what anyone thinks can be trusted any more than simple chance can be trusted. We are the results of random mutations and natural selection, according to evolution, but that means nothing because so are their thought processes, which gives no reason to believe what anyone thinks or says!

So believing that a sky fairy made us in 6 literal days out of dust all of a sudden makes our thought processes more valid? I fail to see her logic here (as usual).

Quote:
Helen:
In other words, evolution says we are not responsible for who we are, or the way we think.
Um, no. Evolution doesn't tell us ANYTHING about how we should behave. Neither does the theory of gravity, or our chemistry books. (Maybe Helen's science texts talk to her, and that's why she's so freaky about evolution! )

Quote:
When they then ‘fight’ for what science is taught in schools as wanting it to be honest or true (which to them simply means ‘mainstream’), that is an oxymoron.
Huh?

Quote:
They cannot claim to want truth there when they deny it in science itself. They cannot try to resort to something being ‘right’ when right is not only subjective, but wired into a person’s thinking, in their view.
Anyone else here think she's using Babelfish?? I have no idea what she is talking about.

Or maybe I'm just not a "True Scientist" (TM).

Helen seems to think that evolution is the one and only theory in science that helps us understand how we work. And her "evolution wires our thinking" idea is pure bullshit. It's almost as if she believes in evolution, but believes that if you deny the theory, you are immune from the hard-wired evil behavioral thinking "caused" by evolution.

In other words, I think that she thinks this:
1. Atheists did evolve, they have hard-wired thinking, aren't responsible for themselves, etc, and this is BAAAAAD.
2. (Her brand of) Christians were specially created (not evolved), and thus their brains work better.

Does anyone else think her philosophy is like that, or is it just me?

Evolution certainly gave us the brain we have, and the capacity for certain types of thought, but we are not "hard wired" to have any specific beliefs. Sheesh, she is a teacher, she should know that by now.

Quote:
The true evolutionist position is atheistic, their verbiage aside. Both immediate and final causes are demanded to be natural and material. This eliminates God from the picture entirely. I submit that this is the actual reason for an insistence on evolution. They are not interested in truth, anyway, according to them, so there is no problem with denying God exists, let alone that He is the Creator.
What a load of crap. I know plenty of people who look for, and accept, naturalistic explanations of many things (gravity, why water freezes, evolution, etc etc) and are religious and believe in God.

Why are evolutionary biologists picked on because they look for natural explanations, when every other scientist does the exact same thing, and often finds a naturalistic explanation! Why isn't Helen whining about how "Meterologists are all atheists because they assume all thunder is explainable by clouds bumping into each other, instead of saying it's God yelling at us" ??

Quote:
The theistic evolutionist is heretical from where I stand because he is trying to tell God what God is allowed to do, both past and present: “you are allowed to start it all off, God, but then you have to back off and not get involved again, because the way you started it must result in everything happening naturally and materially after that. You are not to enter the picture again – unless, of course, it is for our salvation and benefit. Then we will allow you a miracle or two with Jesus, but that’s it, you hear? No more before or after that one!”
Watch out Galileo, your persecuters are coming.

Quote:
Pure heresy. I don’t find theistic evolution to be worth the time to try to fight it. These people are deliberately choosing to fit God into what they can deal with and that’s not God at all; that’s their imagination working overtime.
Well isn't denying evolution also limiting God?

"God made us out of thin air, but there's no way he could have set up evolution."

How arrogant of Helen to assume the mind, and actions, of her God.

Quote:
Evolution’s true and logical position regarding what is taught in schools or believed by anyone should be that people should be left alone, because they can’t help what they are or how they think anyway. They are products of evolution and therefore not responsible for themselves.
Bold added by me. She goes from talking about evolution as a process to talking about people who accept evolution, and seem to think they are the same thing!

Again, she seems to think that atheists did evolve (and that explains why we are all evil heathens trying to eat babies, etc) but christians were created by a wonderful god, therefore they are a-ok.

Quote:
It should be obvious I disagree strongly. I know we are not like that.
Oh, but she thinks atheists ARE like that. So clearly we evolved.
Quote:
I know we have choices about what we will consider true and what beliefs we will build our lives around. And I know that the very concept of truth and right themselves deny evolution in its essence. I know God is real and involved, and I know that science cannot get past simple variation within kind by any means other than direct genetic manipulation, and that even this is really not producing anything new in form or function in any living being; the best it can do is substitute and hope something works.
Well that settles it. Helen just knows that God is real, therefore a scientific theory that contradicts her narrow interpretation of an ancient text that was not written to be a science book must be wrong.

Quote:
Evolution demands suspension of all daily experience and reality. I am talking here of the idea that everything has a natural material cause and that all forms of life therefore are the results of time, chance, mutations, and natural selection.
What daily experience and reality is she talking about? Maybe she never known a person who had her appendix removed, or her tonsils out, or back problems. Maybe she has never cultured bacteria, grown cells, or studied primates.

Again, science has to assume a natural cause! Why is it a problem with evolution, but not all the other scientists? I want an explanation from a creationist on this one, please! Any creationist will do.

Science by definition cannot study miracles (whether or not they happen). What it can do, is provide the most rational explanation of an event. So far, science is winning (we don't believe that thunder is god yelling at us, etc).
Quote:
The ONLY way evolution can really be believed is through a denial of reality as we know it and a radical departure from logic itself.
Clearly.

It's very rational to believe that we have chimp telomeres and centromeres in one of our chromosomes because [helen on] God made our chromosome that way now go read the Bible, you heathens!!![/helen off]

scigirl

P.S. 4squareman and other creationists, what do you think of Helen's post?

[ June 20, 2002: Message edited by: scigirl ]</p>
scigirl is offline  
Old 06-20-2002, 01:23 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
Post

From my sporadic lurking at BB, I have become very fond of Helen.

But don't make a big deal of it. I like anybody who's crazier than I am. And my, how she do take on!

doov
Duvenoy is offline  
Old 06-20-2002, 03:26 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Schenectady, NY
Posts: 45
Post

On the subject of truth:

"Truth -- hard to define you have yours I have mine." P. Pilate from Jesus Christ Superstar 2000.

Donald
DonaldW112 is offline  
Old 06-20-2002, 05:59 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: atlanta, ga
Posts: 691
Post

Quote:
scigirl said:
Again, she seems to think that atheists did evolve (and that explains why we are all evil heathens trying to eat babies, etc) but christians were created by a wonderful god, therefore they are a-ok.

I see what you mean. Her language does suggest that she is saying that. It seems to me that what she is trying to say is that we atheists invented and use the Theory of Evolution to justify our godless and evil way of life, and that if evolution was true everyone would be evil atheists with no morals. I think her brain just isn't functioning properly and she speaks as if we are products of her false concept of evolution simply because of the fact that we believe in evolution.


richard
enemigo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.