|
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-15-2002, 02:42 PM
|
#1 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,302
|
question for Douglas Bender
In another thread, you wrote:
"And I've since found some sources which provide strong reasons for concluding that micro-evolution could not "become" macro-evolution. " Please expand on this, providing references if possible. Thank you. |
|
|
06-16-2002, 03:32 PM
|
#2 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,302
|
bump
|
|
|
|
06-16-2002, 04:41 PM
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"And I've since found some sources which provide strong reasons for concluding that micro-evolution could not "become" macro-evolution. "
Why is it that all of Douglas' strongest, most compelling and revolutionary reasons are always so vague and elusive? Absence of evidence can indeed be evidence of absence. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
