Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-18-2003, 01:34 PM | #231 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
|
Quote:
If you'd like to quote me when I was condescending and disrespectful, Radorth, I will apologise if your concerns are justified. Quote:
According to the bible, god decided what would and what would not be a sin. By inventing the concept of sin, he created sin. He is the one creating excuses and rules for us to live by. Not everyone wants a relationship with one other person for life. How can your god judge what is best for us, when he is NOT us? It's what he THINKS is best for us, but as he is not us, he is making a value judgement. How easy it is for him to tell us to do or not do something, when he does not have to experience it himself. |
||
02-18-2003, 09:19 PM | #232 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
Quote:
Rad |
||
02-18-2003, 09:27 PM | #233 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 602
|
Gabberloony in Judaic Myth
quote:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So why do you figure life expectancies drop off from 900 to 50 years over time according to the Bible? [i] The ridulous supertition that people actually lived 900 years is a sign of significantly impaired thinking. It is a lie in the absolute sense and a really wacky myth. There is not a shred of evidence that humans ever lived 900 years. The wear and tear on the joints of the hips, knees and spinal column would leave scattered shards of calcifcations surrounding fused joints making mobilisation impossible. The yearly normal attrition of brain neurons tht occurs in normally older people at age 90 pr 100 would at 900 years leave a brain without neurons and only astrocytic scar cells in a brain atrophied to the size of a large grape, would mean that those 900 year old wankers would have the intelligence of a large rabbit. In conclusion, I fail to see that an inelligent person could seriously believe that primitive stone age people lived that long in the absense of modern antibiotics, cholesterol lowering drugs. At the most a rare individual many have reached 100-110 maximum, the average life expectance was more like 35 not 50. I wish people would read some history books and science before placing confidence in Bible lies and faerie tales. Fiach |
02-18-2003, 09:32 PM | #234 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 602
|
Jesus is imaginary.
Rad:
"You are accusing a Christ I believe in of all kinds of evil motives with no evidence whatsoever.' I'll take it a step further. I don't accuse Chist of anything such as evil motives with no evidence whatsoever. Jesus Christ is imaginary with no evidence whatsoever that he existed. He is just a story, and a badly written, irrational one at that. Fiach |
02-18-2003, 09:59 PM | #235 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You asked me if I thought nudity was OK, and I gave you Paul's response to such questions. I should have known better, because you answered with this cynical and rhetorical crap: Quote:
My sarcasm is completely justified. Go read what I wrote to Dr. Rick after he asked an intelligent question. Read how I respond to Kirby or Sneddin. Read what I have said about Will Durant and H.G Wells who have done as much harm to our "myth" as 200 of your ilk will do in their whole lifetimes. Those two are honest skeptics, compared to whom you are a lazy-minded cynic. Rad |
||||
02-18-2003, 10:07 PM | #236 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
On second thought, don't read Durant. You might come up with a convincing argument. I should start complimenting you and Winstonjen more. You'd think you were convincing somebody, and I would be facilitating the spread of the Gospel. Rad |
|
02-18-2003, 10:08 PM | #237 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
02-18-2003, 10:12 PM | #238 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
|
|
02-18-2003, 10:16 PM | #239 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
Rad |
|
02-18-2003, 10:27 PM | #240 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 4,676
|
I don`t get this
Radorth,
We`ll get back to what you said about sin later. Theres something about you that makes even less sense to me than Jesus being killed over sins. Whats the deal with Wells and Durant? Why do you constantly keep bringing them up when they clearly do not agree with you about Jesus being God? Why aren`t you emailing them with your gripes instead of taking it out on us if they supposably have much betters arguments worthy of your consideration? Why does it matter if those two guys thought Jesus was probably a real guy? They still don`t think he was a divine god so what does it matter to you if they think he lived or not? I really don`t understand why you have put these two unbelievers up on a pedestal. And if you admire them both so much,how come you don`t believe what they say? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|