Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-16-2002, 08:44 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 4,666
|
Need assistance to rebut a claim
Hey folks. I haven't the time to rebut this claim, but it sorely needs it.
cpatriot500 on the Baptistboards posted a detailed claim that this was a Christian nation in it's founding, using mostly early court cases and decisions of the court. The claims are <a href="http://www.baptistboard.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=18&t=000148&p=2" target="_blank">On this page</a>. You can rebut there, or outline the fallacies here and I can re-word them. His source material appears to be <a href="http://members.aol.com/TestOath/deism.htm" target="_blank">Here</a> and <a href="http://members.aol.com/TestOath/deism.htm" target="_blank">here.</a> I have seen similar arguements before, but this guy is getting a lot of attention, and needs a sound logical thrashing. I will be back on a bit Monday, and in force Tuesday. I appreciate any help I can get. Thanks, folks. |
02-17-2002, 10:17 AM | #2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Takaliapa, KR
Posts: 188
|
I think the treaty with one of the Barbary States is classic evidence...but I don't know where to find an online copy of it.
|
02-17-2002, 10:33 AM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Reading the christian perspective on that page is scary. I wonder why they are blind to the fact that they appear to be striving for an American Taliban?
|
02-17-2002, 10:36 AM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 40
|
The Treaty of Tripoli comes to mind.
"The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded upon the Christian religion." Here's an interesting page about it: <a href="http://www.freethought-web.org/ctrl/buckner_tripoli.html" target="_blank">http://www.freethought-web.org/ctrl/buckner_tripoli.html</a> |
02-17-2002, 11:20 AM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Quote:
I'm sorry, I can't be bothered reading much more of patriot's irrelevancies. Ask him to cite a case in the last 100 years or so wherein someone was prosecuted for "blasphemy." There are plenty of archaic laws on the books that simply wouldn't withstand constitutional scrutiny, were they to be enforced. Most of these "Christian America" people are condemned to forever cite cases and laws that predate the current Constitution and Supreme Court interpretation by decades, if not centuries. |
|
02-17-2002, 11:39 AM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Besides that, any such clause in states' constitutions would be trumped by the U.S. constitution on such matters.
|
02-17-2002, 03:09 PM | #7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 27
|
You can send them to this site:
<a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=reply&f=59&t=000082" target="_blank">http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=reply&f=59&t=000082</a> quoted: ``Probably,'' Story also wrote, ``at the time of the adoption of the constitution and of the amendment to it, now under consideration, the general, if not the universal, sentiment in America was, that Christianity ought to receive encouragement from the state, so far as was not incompatible with the private rights of conscience, and the freedom of religious worship. An attempt to level all religions, and to make it a matter of state policy to hold all in utter indifference, would have created universal disapprobation, if not universal indignation.''\8\ The object, then, of the religion clauses in this view was not to prevent general governmental encouragement of religion, of Christianity, but to prevent religious persecution and to prevent a national establishment.\9\ Jamie |
02-17-2002, 03:12 PM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 27
|
OOPS wrong link...let me try again
<a href="http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=9913946744+0+0+0&WAISaction =retrieve" target="_blank">http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=9913946744+0+0+0&WAISaction =retrieve</a> hope ths works. Jamie |
02-17-2002, 06:12 PM | #9 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Jamie - can't figure out what you're trying to link to, or I would help. You can email me if you want.
|
02-17-2002, 07:57 PM | #10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 27
|
OK, I'm going to try one more time.
<a href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/multidb.cgi" target="_blank">http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/multidb.cgi</a> The site is an analysis of the constitution. Click the text highlighted on the categories and it will bring up some cases and interpretations. This is the home page: <a href="http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/constitution/" target="_blank">http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/constitution/</a> If you want to do a search on your own scroll down to the search box. Jamie (These links better work!) <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|