FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-28-2002, 10:28 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: OH
Posts: 1,292
Talking I figured out how to get "In God We Trust" off our money

Black permanent marker works very well. Next time I take my change to the bank, my coins will be secular, ready to be recirculated.

This won't count as like, vandalism to government property, will it?
Megusic is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 10:43 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ...
Posts: 2,191
Talking

Dunno, but you're "anti-American" now for sure!
Krieger is offline  
Old 12-28-2002, 11:02 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,550
Default

No, it's not vandalism of government property. I'm thinking I heard somewhere that this had to do with the gubmint not having the actual metal to back up the currency.

At any rate, you are not allowed to deface currency for fraudulent purposes, like adding zeroes and stuff, but it's legal to add moustaches and lipstick to the presidents, and to cross out mottoes and such. I always cross out the motto on paper currency, and every now and again add a moustache.

Please note, however, that just because something isn't illegal doesn't mean you won't be harangued or even arrested for it. I believe individuals can refuse to accept the money, and there was a case with those "I Grew Hemp" bubbles where the people stamping the currency were threatened by law enforcement.
lisarea is offline  
Old 12-29-2002, 09:49 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Default

It is illegal to deface the money in such a way as to make it unfit for circulation.

Of course, some people may make the argument that without the words "In God We Trust" money is unfit for circulation.

I would not make that argument.
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 12-29-2002, 10:03 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,550
Default

I'm not aware of any US code that refers to making money unfit for circulation, but Section 18, Title 331 says this:

Quote:
Section 331. Mutilation, diminution, and falsification of coins

Whoever fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates, impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales, or lightens any of the coins coined at the mints of the United States, or any foreign coins which are by law made current or are in actual use or circulation as money
within the United States; or

Whoever fraudulently possesses, passes, utters, publishes, or sells, or attempts to pass, utter, publish, or sell, or brings into
the United States, any such coin, knowing the same to be altered, defaced, mutilated, impaired, diminished, falsified, scaled, or lightened -
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
The law is not an exact science, of course, and it seems to be fairly common for judges to just...well...make stuff up.

But the way I read this, the word 'fraudulently' is key, and the motivation for crossing out the national motto is not fraudulent.

If there's some other relevant code, could you point me to it? I've found a lot of opinions and such, but they only vaguely refer to 'the law,' so I'm not going to believe them until I see the actual laws.
lisarea is offline  
Old 12-29-2002, 11:48 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

God Off Money dot com has a good FAQ on these questions. They were forced to stop selling stamps for people to use on bills, but you can order a stamp of your own.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-29-2002, 12:00 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by lisarea
I'm not aware of any US code that refers to making money unfit for circulation, but Section 18, Title 331 says this:
Section 331 refers only to coins. Read on...

Section 18, Part I, Chapter 17, Section 333:
(emphasis mine)

Quote:
Sec. 333. - Mutilation of national bank obligations

Whoever mutilates, cuts, defaces, disfigures, or perforates, or unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, or Federal Reserve bank, or the Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 12-29-2002, 10:15 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,550
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shadowy Man
Section 331 refers only to coins. Read on...
DUDE!

I have no earthly idea how I missed that.

Thanks.

BTW, I agree that this still doesn't make it unfit for circulation.
lisarea is offline  
Old 12-30-2002, 10:47 AM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Arrow

There's more about defacing currency on the Where's George homepage

Edited to add: Don't forget about God off money!
Shake is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 12:10 AM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lincoln, NE, United States
Posts: 160
Default

its a disgrace though about the coins, they last longer.

thousands of years in the future, people are going look at our coins and do a double take when they see 2003 In God We Trust.

They are going to wonder how they got to where they are with that attitude still prevailing.

just my 2 cp
managalar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:14 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.