Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-03-2003, 02:06 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 276
|
Jesus:Selfish or selfless?
On one hand, he is said to have healed people, told some good morals and advice, and apparentally gave his life as some sort of sin sacrifice.
On the other hand, he commanded people to forsake their friends, families, and homes, stated he was the "only way" and often set impossible and puzzling behavioral standards. Not to mention that he failed to practice what he preached. No matter how many ways you try to justify it, calling your enemies "Brood of vipers!" is in no way, shape or form, "Loving your enemy". Any thoughts? |
02-03-2003, 02:17 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Durango, Colorado
Posts: 7,116
|
Yes, mostly that if there even *was* a historical Jesus it is highly unlikely that the purported story of his life is an accurate historical record.
HOWEVER, if your question refers not to reality per se but him as he is presented in the Bible, I'd say that he appeared to be a freakin' lunatic. |
02-03-2003, 06:22 PM | #3 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 253
|
Re: Jesus:Selfish or selfless?
Quote:
The fact that he "commanded people to forsake their friends, families, and homes, stated he was the "only way" and often set impossible and puzzling behavioral standards" does not necessarily mean he was selfish. Also, it is still possible to love your enemy, and still have them as an enemy - so calling some of them a 'Brood of vipers' would be appropriate. Please consider that 'loving ones enemy' means potentially something quite different than merely 'turning the other cheek.' 'Turning the other cheek' refers to not acting out in rage just because you have been affronted - something people often do - this was probably pretty good advice. However, to love one's enemy could mean something like being fair to them, and with them, and not hating them as people, but merely hating what they do instead. Also, in being fair to your enemy, it would be important to give them the benefit of the doubt, when reasonable, and to treat them civilly as people, unless they deserve retribution. People often point out Jesus' rage at the moneychangers in the Temple.. well, in his eyes (and supposedly in God's eyes) these people were committing a terrible sin - Jesus acted justly when he over turned their tables and so forth, according to Christianity. In short, it is good to love your enemy because though they may be evil they also 'know not what they do' and thusly, must, and can be taught otherwise. An enemy is not a thing independent unto itself, as Satan is supposed to be, so it is not right to hate them for who they are, only for what they do. Many people hate others merely because they had spited them at some point in the past, today we may call this behaviour 'petty' or 'immature' and one might argue that that is what Jesus was trying to point out - albeit in a far more friendly, and dare I say it, soteriological fashion. |
|
02-03-2003, 10:14 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 625
|
The guy strikes me as a freaking lunatic. One moment he advocates no violence, the next moment he's beating up money-changers at the temple, one moment he preaches love, the next moment he's wearing a holier-than-thou attitude and hurling kindergarten-level insults at those who don't follow him. Does he ever not contradict himself? IMHO, all too often he acts, at best, like a child that never grew up.
|
02-03-2003, 10:18 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
|
selfless
|
02-03-2003, 10:38 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
|
Fictional person made up by ancient superstitious goat herders.
|
02-04-2003, 10:09 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Heaven, just assasinated god
Posts: 578
|
Quote:
There's no such thing as selfless. It's still selfish in that by being so called 'selfless' it actually satisfies the person's selfish nature. |
|
02-04-2003, 10:25 AM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In a nondescript, black helicopter.
Posts: 6,637
|
It seems to me as if he's a common everyday minor celebrity who is following his own primitive moral/religious code that he was taught by his culture, only slightly modified.
I see nothing special about him. As far as sons of gods go, he was pretty tame. As far as teachers full of wisdom, there were better. As far as a deity in and of himself, not all that striking really. |
02-04-2003, 10:51 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,311
|
As a man or myth, he was selfish and power hungry. Or, quite insane, charismatic, and deluded by the popular mythology of the times.
|
02-04-2003, 11:26 AM | #10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 99
|
As God, Jesus has every right to be selfish. Claiming to be the only way is claiming his deity.
As God in the form of man (for the 33 yrs. he walked among us) he was also an example by healing and loving others (i.e. making friends w/ the "rejects" of society, etc.). I think you're making the "brood of vipers" comment a little more than it is. He was speaking the truth. I could call a prostitute a whore and be completely justified if she had no desire to become anything eles and hated me for trying to encourage her to be different, as Jesus tried to do with the religious teachers of his day. On that same vain, Jesus did make friends with one Pharasie in particular--Nicodimas. Look at John 3. Sorry for my poor spelling. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|