Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-08-2002, 09:06 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 1,537
|
Have you admit defeat in a religious argument?
Simply because they're too dumb to comprehend everything?
Start: Naive Christian: Who or what created the first cell? ME: Who created God? His mom? Jerry Springer? Naive Christian: No, no, you answer me first! ME: It can't be explained because another question will materialise. Ad infinitium. Naive Christian: That's all? If you can't explain why still deny God? Just a stupid example... |
10-08-2002, 09:21 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
You could have told him about organic RNA microspheres. I'm sure he would understand.
|
10-08-2002, 09:21 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North America
Posts: 1,603
|
So one gathers....
|
10-08-2002, 09:25 PM | #4 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Winter of My Discontent
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
|
|
10-09-2002, 08:30 AM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,460
|
Quote:
Now, if they would make an effort to communicate in a two way discussion it would be a completely different story, but they are set on proving themselves right and couldn't care less about actual conversation. -Nick |
|
10-09-2002, 04:26 PM | #6 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Charlotte,NC USA
Posts: 379
|
Quote:
Take the time to do the research, spend valuable effort putting your thoughts together in a very clear way, type your little fingers to the bone....... look proudly at your argument and rebuttal to the average christians points..... Your answer will be OH YEA.....well I dont care what you say....the bible is always correct cause it's the word of god and what you say means nothing to me you satanic moron atheist. Oh well ........ edited to remove obscenities. Wolf [ October 09, 2002: Message edited by: sighhswolf ]</p> |
|
10-09-2002, 05:04 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL Reality Adventurer
Posts: 5,276
|
Arguing science with most Christians is like arguing photography with a blind man. What is the point. If they are Christians they are automatically reality challenged. They have to accept at least one miracle. I am not sure if accepting the one miracle places their mind in brain lock or if Christianity selects for weak minds.
Starboy |
10-09-2002, 05:44 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 4,666
|
One of my most frustrating arguements was in this arena.
Opponent: A fundy YEC. Topic: Evolution or not of the eye. My post to him was a multi-page, cross-indexed, bibliobraphed and referenced detailing of the light sensitive organ-to-eye evolution showing living examples, fossil record, and scientific predictions that were later borne true by fossil finds. transitionals and transitionals between transitionals detailed throughout. His response. "No." That is all. No rebuttal, no discussion, just "no". He then went on to re-iterate his original position that the eye disproves evolution, and that no one has been able to show him any different. <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> I still argue them, and have had some success in badgering them to either rebutt or admit defeat. it is still a toss-up. I get prayed for a lot, too. |
10-10-2002, 06:44 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
|
Eyes are of no use for one who will not see.
|
10-10-2002, 10:04 AM | #10 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,460
|
sighhswolf,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
-Nick |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|