FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-29-2003, 07:57 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
Default Can someone with actual knowledge critique this statement?

I have encountered someone who claims the following:

Quote:
Actually there is a test and one which scripture passes with flying colors.

The test is whether anyone can find significant error in cases where the answer is known by other means with a high degree of reliability.

The Bible has been demonstrated and is even admitted by its critics to be the most accurate ancient document known to mankind.

By a country mile.

The implication is clear.

The Bible was written by fallible men who must have had some assistance of some kind in order for it to end up as accurate as it apparently is.
I am highly skeptical of such claims when made by people who advocate Biblical literalism (e.g. this person), but I am not a historian, which is why I turn to you wonderful people.
Lobstrosity is offline  
Old 05-29-2003, 08:24 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 69
Default Re: Can someone with actual knowledge critique this statement?

Quote:
Originally posted by Lobstrosity
I have encountered someone who claims the following:



I am highly skeptical of such claims when made by people who advocate Biblical literalism (e.g. this person), but I am not a historian, which is why I turn to you wonderful people.
I couldn't get through Genesis without refuting that claim. Day and night were created before the sun? C'mon.

I suggest you read, "Who Wrote the Bible" at the Straight Dope. You'll find it at:

http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mbible1.html

Tenspace
Tenspace is offline  
Old 05-29-2003, 08:25 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Tell him/her to list "cases in the bible where the answer is known by other means with a high degree of reliability" first.
Like in Leviticus, rabbits are known not to chew cud right?
Ask him/her that.

Ask him how Judas died and the two contradictory accounts of his death in Matthew and Acts.

Tell him to list examples so that when you drive a truck through them, he doesnt weasel himself out. I have seen some wesel themselves out of the Genesis example above.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 05-29-2003, 08:30 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

The test is whether anyone can find significant error in cases where the answer is known by other means with a high degree of reliability.

The first three chapters of Genesis have been clearly and decisively shown to be myth. So the book starts out with "significant error".
Mageth is offline  
Old 05-29-2003, 08:39 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mageth
The test is whether anyone can find significant error in cases where the answer is known by other means with a high degree of reliability.

The first three chapters of Genesis have been clearly and decisively shown to be myth. So the book starts out with "significant error".
This person is an ardent young-Earth creationist who believes all of science points to the accuracy of Genesis. I have been arguing this point for quite a while with him. As such, he would frustratingly not accept such a claim. In fact, this whole discussion came up when I tried to argue that the Bible cannot be infallible (since it was written by fallible man) and thus the position of assuming a priori that the Bible literally tells us the absolute truth is faulty. This is his attempt to justify absolute Biblical literalism (to such a degree that any evidence that contradicts the Bible must be instantly rejected as incorrect).
Lobstrosity is offline  
Old 05-29-2003, 08:54 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Well, you might try arguing that, for example, the Genesis creation account(s) and the Flood account are "wrong" not because "man is fallible" but because the authors originally and knowingly wrote them as myths, not as historical accounts. You could point him to, for example the Sumerian/Babylonian creation/flood myths which predate the Bible and from which the Biblical myths were derived.

Or you could just :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:.
Mageth is offline  
Old 05-29-2003, 09:07 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,505
Default Re: Can someone with actual knowledge critique this statement?

Quote:
Originally posted by Lobstrosity
I am highly skeptical of such claims when made by people who advocate Biblical literalism (e.g. this person), but I am not a historian, which is why I turn to you wonderful people.
Here's a post by a history student who is working on his thesis. If you think of the Bible as a "historically accurate" document after reading it, you're sticking your fingers in your ears, covering your eyes and going "la la la la la".

The Exodus: A Dead Issue

-Mike...
mike_decock is offline  
Old 05-30-2003, 06:05 AM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 141
Default

I would have to look it up for the passage, but the Bible states the value of Pi to be 3. So has the value changed over the years, or are we wrong? Or is it that the Bible writers were wrong?

-Nero
triplew00t is offline  
Old 05-30-2003, 06:54 AM   #9
CX
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
Default Re: Can someone with actual knowledge critique this statement?

Quote:
Originally posted by Lobstrosity
I am highly skeptical of such claims when made by people who advocate Biblical literalism (e.g. this person), but I am not a historian, which is why I turn to you wonderful people.
It is invariably futile to attempt logical debate with strict biblical literalists. There is nearly always a way for someone to fit biblical texts to their preconceived suppositions. Someone whose confessional stance a priori tells them that the bible is the inerrant, infallible word of god is not going to be swayed by rational arguments. Certainly naming any of a number of inconsistencies is not going to do it. For every one you come up with someone long ago came up with an apologetic response. You could ask him "which bible?". The Hebrew Bible, Protestant Old & New Testaments, Roman Catholic OT & NT and Eastern Orthodox OT & NT differ in the books that are included. Further there is a wide variety of different text families that have come down to us none of which are precisely the same. But a better approach would be simply to forget about having such a debate in the first place, unless there are bystanders who may be swayed one way or the other.
CX is offline  
Old 05-30-2003, 07:01 AM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 167
Default Re: Can someone with actual knowledge critique this statement?

Quote:
Originally posted by Lobstrosity
Actually there is a test and one which scripture passes with flying colors.

The test is whether anyone can find significant error in cases where the answer is known by other means with a high degree of reliability.

The Bible has been demonstrated and is even admitted by its critics to be the most accurate ancient document known to mankind.

By a country mile.

The implication is clear.

The Bible was written by fallible men who must have had some assistance of some kind in order for it to end up as accurate as it apparently is.
The implication is clear. Only Space Aliens are capable of producing ancient document accuracy to within a country mile. Therefore, Space Aliens helped man write the bible.

Now, I have a bridge I'd like to sell you.
Greg2003 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.