FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-14-2003, 08:33 PM   #101
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Grand Junction CO
Posts: 2,231
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
What if they continue to sin, i.e. rebel against the commandments and limits set by God?
Hi Rad.

Why do you ask? Is it relevant to my point? In what way?
Nowhere357 is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 08:38 PM   #102
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
Default

I just did contradict it. A good God is a just God. Sin deserves punishment. Eternal sin demands eternal punishment. And I have no problem imagining Stalin in hell demanding this and that, cursing God and finding fault with everything and everybody but himself, just as he did on earth. In fact I've heard at least two atheists say they would never admit God was right. One has said he might pony up, albeit for the wrong reasons. And perhaps they were some of the more honest ones.

Rad
Radorth is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 08:55 PM   #103
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
What if they continue to sin, i.e. rebel against the commandments and limits set by God?
An omnipotent being could easily reprogram such troublesome people to behave perfectly. By not doing so, such a being would consent by default to those people's actions.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 08:57 PM   #104
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
I just did contradict it. A good God is a just God. Sin deserves punishment. Eternal sin demands eternal punishment. ...
Why does ANYTHING deserve punishment when one can reprogram the offenders so that they never misbehave again?
lpetrich is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 09:11 PM   #105
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Grand Junction CO
Posts: 2,231
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
A good God is a just God. Sin deserves punishment.
I'm sorry you're angry, Rad. But I hope you realize that I am not resposible for the actions of others.

Anyway, I don't disagree with these two statements. Although "sin" hasn't been defined.

Quote:
Eternal sin demands eternal punishment.
This makes no sense to me. I assume "sin" refers to the actions or behaviors of people. There are no eternal actions or behaviors of people, so there is no eternal sin.

Perhaps you should define "sin".

Quote:
And I have no problem imagining Stalin in hell demanding this and that, cursing God and finding fault with everything and everybody but himself, just as he did on earth.
If hell was reserved for mean and cruel people, you MAY have a point. Debatable. Do you claim only mean and cruel people go to hell?

Quote:
In fact I've heard at least two atheists say they would never admit God was right. One has said he might pony up, albeit for the wrong reasons. And perhaps they were some of the more honest ones.
Atheists do not believe god exists, so it would be non-sensical to assume they could admit god was anything at all. Perhaps you are asking the wrong questions.

Quote:
I just did contradict it.
No, you have not.
First, you need to define "sin".
Nowhere357 is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 10:26 PM   #106
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,505
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
"Assaulted by a crucifix"? I disagree intensely with most Catholic practices. I think the Mormon "faith" is truly insulting when they tell us some golden plates were lost a mere 175 years ago. But I can't say I ever felt "assaulted" by a crucifix or one of those vapid Mormon ads.
A crucifix is an instrument of torture. Putting electric chairs or guillotines in public places would be in poor taste, right? The religion it symbolizes is also offensive to me. I hope you can understand that.

Quote:
You really must get one of those newfangled remotes with the channel flicker there Mike.
Got me one of them TiVo thingies. I just zip through those commercials and watch only the shows I like .

Quote:
My view is that I can respond if somebody asserts something I disagree with but it would not be right for me to strike up philosophical discussions on my job. I'm there to work.
Work? Dang, I forgot what I was there for .

Quote:
In fact I just talk to the two Christians I know there (out of approx 100 I know) and pretty much leave it at that.
I talk to the Christians, Mormons, Pagans, Theists and Atheists alike.

-Mike...
mike_decock is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 06:28 AM   #107
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 710
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by lpetrich
Why does ANYTHING deserve punishment when one can reprogram the offenders so that they never misbehave again?
If God did this, he would be negating our free will. This is something he refuses to do. He wants us to choose to love him, and part of loving him is obedience - "If you love me, you will obey my commands".

We are not robots to be reprogrammed. We are people with whom God desires a relationship of love.

Kevin
spurly is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 06:31 AM   #108
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL Reality Adventurer
Posts: 5,276
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by spurly
If God did this, he would be negating our free will. This is something he refuses to do. He wants us to choose to love him, and part of loving him is obedience - "If you love me, you will obey my commands".

We are not robots to be reprogrammed. We are people with whom God desires a relationship of love.

Kevin
Spurly, more Christian lies and propaganda? If your purported god wished to preserve our "free will" there would no commandments.

Starboy
Starboy is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 06:43 AM   #109
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,505
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by spurly
We are people with whom God desires a relationship of love.
Please love me... OR ELSE!!!

That's sickening, Keving. Truly sickening.

-Mike...
mike_decock is offline  
Old 04-15-2003, 08:05 AM   #110
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
Default

Re: Ip

Quote:
An omnipotent being could easily reprogram such troublesome people to behave perfectly. By not doing so, such a being would consent by default to those people's actions.
You mean kinda like you claim Christian ministers do? I thought you were against such reprogramming.

How about if he gives us a "new nature"? Does that qualify?

Thanks for the help.

Re MDC

Quote:
I hope you can understand that.
It's offensive to me as well, but it is also on private property. I suspect you would defend an "artist" putting Christ upside down in a jar of urine on PUBLIC PROPERTY at my expense is fine though. Right? Ah yes, let's do remove everything from the earth which somebody finds offensive. Agreed?

Re: Nowhere

Quote:
I'm sorry you're angry, Rad.
Why I'm not in the least, and find your comment rather presumptious and patronizing. Was I being particularly sarcastic with you?

Quote:
But I hope you realize that I am not resposible for the actions of others.
Taking responsibility for your own sins will be fine. The question is whether you agree with God's commandments and limits as found in the Sermon on the Mount, and whether you will disobey them eternally. Many atheists have suggested they will, even if the Bible turns out to be true, and there is only one way to escape the penallty.

Quote:
This makes no sense to me. I assume "sin" refers to the actions or behaviors of people.
All sin stems from pride and rebellion, which is the "original" sin and the source of all others. It does not have to be a specific action.

Quote:
If hell was reserved for mean and cruel people, you MAY have a point. Debatable. Do you claim only mean and cruel people go to hell?
No, I but I do claim its inhabitants will be incorrigible hypercrites and hypocrites and those who refuse to obey God, ever. You're evading the point I think.

Quote:
Atheists do not believe god exists, so it would be non-sensical to assume they could admit god was anything at all.
But they are saying that even if he does, even if he turns out to be Christ himself, they will never obey him.

OK let's stop beating around the bush. If it turns ot Christ is God, would you accept his offer and agree to obey him, to be reprogrammmed (as it were) with a "new nature" or not?

(I'll go out on a limb and predict we will now see what this question usually engenders, i.e, inane responses and evasive maneuvers).

Rad
Radorth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.