Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-26-2002, 05:42 PM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
|
Well, according to some crationist on another board, who heard it from an Israeli boatbuilder, the dimensions given were for the displacement of the Ark, not its actual size. Although what difference that makes is another matter. If the Ark is bigger than the number of cubits specified, it'd be impossible to make from wood, especialy without pitch, which was one of the things produced during the flood in creation space (although the Israeli boatbuilder thinks that in fact such a boat would be entirely seaworthy), and if it's smaller, there'd be the problem of fitting all the animals on board.
|
11-26-2002, 05:50 PM | #12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 70
|
Hmm, I wished I had my references here still.
Wooden boats even approaching such a size were extremely vulnerable, and moreover, they leaked so much they needed machine pumps to keep them afloat. Obviously, whoever wrote the ark legend did not belong to a seafaring nation. He knew zilch about boats. |
11-26-2002, 06:10 PM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
|
Quote:
|
|
11-26-2002, 06:18 PM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
|
Anybody want to put out an educated guess on the amount of food that had to be stored to feed 2 of every kind on this planet for 40 days and nights? I guess, the rules are no eating another kind!
[ November 26, 2002: Message edited by: Principia ]</p> |
11-26-2002, 06:24 PM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,242
|
Just to play devil's advocate, but didn't the Chinese explorer Zheng He (1371 - 1435), use ships that were around 400' long? Accounts on the 'net are pretty consistant in agreeing that they were this length, if not longer. The biggest is said to have been 440' long and 186' wide.
Edited to add... This latter vessel was said to carry 1,000 men, presumably including supplies. If the dimensions and manpower of this vessel are accurate, it would seem reasonable to conclude that Noah's ark couldn't possibly have held seven of every clean kind and two of every unclean plus the supplies necessary to sustain them for over a year. [ November 26, 2002: Message edited by: Jeremy Pallant ]</p> |
11-26-2002, 06:28 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: hereabouts
Posts: 734
|
Quote:
|
|
11-26-2002, 06:42 PM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
What bothers me more than the size of the boat is the way that many creationists severely shave down the number of neccessary animals, presumably because they have speciated (of all things) since then. Sometimes, hypocracy is so powerful it has its own stench.
|
11-26-2002, 07:24 PM | #18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
|
Well, let's face it - as long as humans get to be in a "kind" all by themselves, do creationists really care about the rest of the animals?
|
11-26-2002, 08:03 PM | #19 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Quote:
|
|
11-26-2002, 08:52 PM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,358
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|