FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-26-2002, 05:42 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
Post

Well, according to some crationist on another board, who heard it from an Israeli boatbuilder, the dimensions given were for the displacement of the Ark, not its actual size. Although what difference that makes is another matter. If the Ark is bigger than the number of cubits specified, it'd be impossible to make from wood, especialy without pitch, which was one of the things produced during the flood in creation space (although the Israeli boatbuilder thinks that in fact such a boat would be entirely seaworthy), and if it's smaller, there'd be the problem of fitting all the animals on board.
Albion is offline  
Old 11-26-2002, 05:50 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 70
Post

Hmm, I wished I had my references here still.

Wooden boats even approaching such a size were extremely vulnerable, and moreover, they leaked so much they needed machine pumps to keep them afloat.

Obviously, whoever wrote the ark legend did not belong to a seafaring nation. He knew zilch about boats.
Jan Haugland is offline  
Old 11-26-2002, 06:10 PM   #13
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Jan Haugland:
<strong>Wooden boats even approaching such a size were extremely vulnerable, and moreover, they leaked so much they needed machine pumps to keep them afloat.</strong>
Let's also toss in the fact that this is a gigantic wooden boat that has to survive the most intense storm to ever hit the planet.
pz is offline  
Old 11-26-2002, 06:18 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
Talking

Anybody want to put out an educated guess on the amount of food that had to be stored to feed 2 of every kind on this planet for 40 days and nights? I guess, the rules are no eating another kind!

[ November 26, 2002: Message edited by: Principia ]</p>
Principia is offline  
Old 11-26-2002, 06:24 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,242
Post

Just to play devil's advocate, but didn't the Chinese explorer Zheng He (1371 - 1435), use ships that were around 400' long? Accounts on the 'net are pretty consistant in agreeing that they were this length, if not longer. The biggest is said to have been 440' long and 186' wide.

Edited to add...

This latter vessel was said to carry 1,000 men, presumably including supplies. If the dimensions and manpower of this vessel are accurate, it would seem reasonable to conclude that Noah's ark couldn't possibly have held seven of every clean kind and two of every unclean plus the supplies necessary to sustain them for over a year.

[ November 26, 2002: Message edited by: Jeremy Pallant ]</p>
Jeremy Pallant is offline  
Old 11-26-2002, 06:28 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: hereabouts
Posts: 734
Smile

Quote:
Wooden boats even approaching such a size were extremely vulnerable, and moreover, they leaked so much they needed machine pumps to keep them afloat.
That particular wooden ship would've needed really awesome machine pumps just to get all the manure and urine out.
One of the last sane is offline  
Old 11-26-2002, 06:42 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

What bothers me more than the size of the boat is the way that many creationists severely shave down the number of neccessary animals, presumably because they have speciated (of all things) since then. Sometimes, hypocracy is so powerful it has its own stench.
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 11-26-2002, 07:24 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
Post

Well, let's face it - as long as humans get to be in a "kind" all by themselves, do creationists really care about the rest of the animals?
Albion is offline  
Old 11-26-2002, 08:03 PM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Jeremy Pallant:
<strong>Just to play devil's advocate, but didn't the Chinese explorer Zheng He (1371 - 1435), use ships that were around 400' long? Accounts on the 'net are pretty consistant in agreeing that they were this length, if not longer. The biggest is said to have been 440' long and 186' wide.
Pallant ]</strong>
Zheng He's ships reached the physical limits. Also, they had numerous modern accouterments -- copper sheating, iron braces, compartments -- that presumably Noah knew nothing about.
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 11-26-2002, 08:52 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,358
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Albion:
<strong>Well, according to some crationist on another board, who heard it from an Israeli boatbuilder, the dimensions given were for the displacement of the Ark, not its actual size...</strong>
Isn't the "actual size" of a boat by definition greater than the displacement? How does the "Israeli boatbuilder" think that this distinction, even if true, would do anything but hinder his case?
Arrowman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:10 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.