FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-24-2002, 10:00 AM   #11
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by nixon:
<strong>Hey Amos! How do you explain X and Y chromosomes in said infants DNA; which actually predates the conception. Did you know that the male determines the sex of the infant based on which of his sperm makes it to the egg?

Talk about pre-ordination! Ha ha</strong>
And how does the sperm gain independent propulsion to becomes transporter of DNA?

The male determines the sex is an answer from scientific obscurity because if the ovum is "positive" there is no way a Y chromosome will enter. Kind of like magentism and only works one way and since the ovum is the stable the X and Y become the variant and hence, she determines the sex after all.

Always remember that if the Y is illusive it must be sucked, or am I the first one to tell you this.
 
Old 03-24-2002, 11:13 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ca
Posts: 51
Post

Amos

Please quote the source of this little gem.

Quote:
The male determines the sex is an answer from scientific obscurity because if the ovum is "positive" there is no way a Y chromosome will enter. Kind of like magentism and only works one way and since the ovum is the stable the X and Y become the variant and hence, she determines the sex after all.
Or did you just pull this rabbit out of your hat. Some of you guys say the damndest things.
I'd love to stay and chat more, but there is fresh powder up in the Sierra's and I feel the urge to go carve some tracks.

Hondo
Hondo is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 03:01 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 1,392
Post

I am so glad that Amos is not a biology teacher. He could set back reproductive biology centuries.
sullster is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 04:22 PM   #14
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by sullster:
<strong>I am so glad that Amos is not a biology teacher. He could set back reproductive biology centuries.</strong>
We never took that in class but we learned about genetics and the reproduction of traits in animals.
 
Old 03-25-2002, 08:31 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Valleyview, OH USA
Posts: 6,638
Cool

Hey Amos...Even if you were right, you destroyed your own point to try to prove me wrong.

(Your point being..."God created man as androgyne, neither with balls nor vagina but with the potential to get one or the other during conception (notice here that creation precedes conception.")

Ha ha
nixon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:24 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.