Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-04-2002, 10:47 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
|
This is nuts!
PC Canadians rule out Christmas
<a href="http://uk.news.yahoo.com/021125/80/dffvg.html" target="_blank">Yahoo news UK link</a> Toronto mayor, councillors push for Christmas, not holiday, tree <a href="http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/PEstory/TGAM/20021123/UTREEN/national/national/national_temp/5/5/26/" target="_blank">GlobeAndMail.com Link</a> {edited by Toto to shorten links to keep page in line} [ December 04, 2002: Message edited by: Toto ]</p> |
12-04-2002, 11:02 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Middle, Kansas
Posts: 2,637
|
Yeah, especially since christmas isn't about christianity anyway.
Jesus wasn't born then (if at all) The christians co-opted a pagan solstice party to make their own holiday more popular. The tree is pagan not christian. Santa is commercialized even if he is "St. Nick". Most of christmas's supporting cast is not religious. (Frosty, Rudolph, Olive the other reindeer, the Grinch, even Ebeneezer Scrooge) |
12-04-2002, 11:27 AM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: N/A
Posts: 349
|
So it's not that nuts then; it's actually more accurate to refer to it as a holiday tree, and Christianity takes another hit (always a good thing).
True, it's not that big a deal to refer to it as a "Christmas" tree, but it's also an equally small deal to simply refer to it as a holiday tree; so why make a big deal out of the small deal? Frankly, I think being down on "PC" has been done to death, & I've <a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=47&t=000091&p=" target="_blank">said so</a> in the past. --B. |
12-04-2002, 12:25 PM | #4 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|