FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-03-2003, 05:47 PM   #11
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: J.Krishnamurti

Quote:
Originally posted by Volker.Doormann
The Catholic Church is a phantom. There are only individual souls. These souls are able to perceive effects of causality (Karma) and able to cause (karmic) effects.
I think it is cynic, to state such claims.
//

This world is a dark place, were people searching for light. It is a caused crime to dim the light more by teaching darkness is more light then sunshine.


Hello Volker, maybe you forgot, or maybe you never knew, that Catholic children are exposed to the brilliance of heaven long before the lights are dimmed on them. The Church teaches and aims to instill virtue and piety in children knowing that it will make their Eden a brighter place to remember long before they are set free to get lost in their own jungle of life.

To further prepare them for the world they plant "milestones of faith" along their journey of life and these are called Sacraments because they will deliver when called upon.

So the violence we must encounter is no more than a certain deviation from the brightness we once knew and so our encounter with the world does not have to be a gutter story. In this sense is it a win-win situation because they can prosper when the sun shines and be harvested when it is raining.
Quote:


It do not counts the short fleshly fun catholic Christian man's have with woman's clothes in this fleshly world. It do count's the amount of causes put in actions, because only this caused actions results in effects.


Good point because for the same reason are they the real victims of a previous cause.
Quote:


//

Each one has his fate from his caused actions. If this effects are not recognized as causal effects, then one is going on trying to enhance the disorder of nature by the teaching of Amos generating violence, expecting sunshine.

It is not the disorder, which leads to truth, it is the order.

Volker
You are right about the caused actions but I disagree that order can lead to truth. Let me show you how the Church employs our violence (Krishnamurti's definition) for its own end. In the allegory of Hansel and Grethel the breadcrumbs were deeds of righteousness that they had placed while going into the jungle of life. Of course when darkness came they were never to be found because it was darkness that had either consumed or overshadowed them. In other words, there is no return for the righteous because order becomes disorder or darkness would never be.

Catholics here place milestones of faith along their journey and are allowed to remain lost because they were given a white candle at their Baptism that they now re-cognize as a ray of hope. This will be the beginning of their journey back into Eden (not the Church) and should take no more then 40 months because the milestones will highlight the necessary events (much like Bethel, Hebron and Shechem in the OT).

So more than anything, I advocate virtue and piety in children so that their days may be bright and a time to remember. If this is done well (don't ask me how), it will serve them as a direct link to Eden and hotline to heaven. If this, then it can be said that they are never really lost but only feel as if they are lost.
 
Old 08-03-2003, 06:48 PM   #12
DBT
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ɹǝpunuʍop puɐן ǝɥʇ
Posts: 17,906
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Doctor X
Sorry to micturate on everyone's cheerios, but I believe Martin Gardner wrote a particularly severe criticism of Krishnamurti in the Skeptical Inquirer--I will have to find it--wait, funny what the "search" function can do on their website:

I cannot link the article, but it is from: Volume 24, Number 4, July/August--"Notes of a Fringe-Watcher: David Bohm and Jiddo Krishnamurti," Martin Gardner

There is also a book, Madam Blavatsky's Baboon.

Anyways, if the more "pro" side is aware of these criticisms, I would welcome a response.

--J.D.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Its been a while since I've read anything, there was a bit of scandal involved with Madam Blavatsky and Leadbetter and later with Krishnamurti the allegations were that he was having an afair with his editors wife-Rosalind Rajapol- and her daughter,Rahda Sloss wrote a scathing book, basically saying that his private persona was different to his public image.
But like Ronin,I enjoyed reading about their lives, they were an interesting bunch and of course any insights he had remain valid and true despite anything else he may have done.
DBT is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 08:59 PM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

There is a response to Gardner's article on this page (scroll down to "Response").

Another author has this to say:

Quote:
Now for example, take Jiddu Krishnamurti. Lots of folks called him K. K was a very poor student and K did poorly as an RRCS [retentive rational cognitive style] person. Instead, he developed into an NNCS [Nonrational Nonretentive Cognitive Style] person. He called this NNCS his meditation: the empty mind. K was a natural meditator. He didn't learn any traditional method of meditation. Nevertheless, K gave long talks which intrigued and inspired many people so they came back and brought their friends. K was recognized as a "spiritual" teacher, but people accustomed to RRCS had difficulty understanding K and some academics dismiss his writing as vacant or meaningless. For example, in the July/August, 2000 issue of Skeptical Inquirer Magazine, Martin Gardner writes:

"I have done my best to try to read some of these books without falling asleep. It is hard to understand how the author of such vapid ideas could have mesmerized listeners, most of them women, when he lectured, and to have captured the admiration of a great physicist.[David Bohm]"(8)

After studying the life and works of J. Krishnamurti, many working psychiatrists would diagnose K as having a disorder. These same experts would even diagnose a disorder in other spiritual persons recognized as inspired by millions of people. In fact, the moral code many Westerners still try to follow was coined by a person who experienced both visual and auditory hallucinations. Indeed, Moses saw a bush appear to burn, and a voice spoke to Moses out of the bush. Martin Luther threw his inkpot at a visual hallucination he said was the devil. So what superior ethical system can the rational retentive academics and the psychiatrist-experts in whom they trust provide, and what is their evidence that this new moral system is better? Huh?? Many shrinks and other hubris-ridden humanist-intellectuals have never thought this matter through. Furthermore, unlike the writins of Moses, the modern humanists write in a way scarcely anyone who hasn't a Ph.D. can understand.

They are ultra-exclusive. The wise teacher is not.
from Nonrational, Nonretentive Cognitive Style at Humbolt State

So if you think that rational mind can develop a better ethical system than the 613 commandments developed by a nut who talked to burning bushes, or the rabid anti-Semitic ravings of Martin Luther, K. may not exactly be your guy. But take whatever insights you can get from what he wrote, with or without some help from the local agricultural crop at HSU.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 09:43 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Toto:

When I have a faster connection, I will check out the link. I will note, however, that the second quote does not address the criticisms of Gardner. It appeals to ignorance as if ignorance is something special--"all dose udda guys have hi falutin' talk."

Not that I have a personal opinion. For the record, I had a teacher and friend who was very much into JK.

Madam Blavatsky was a charlatan, however.

I would never consider Moses, Luther, or many of the other "great leaders" anything to emulate.

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 10:53 PM   #15
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Doctor X
[iMadam Blavatsky was a charlatan, however.

I would never consider Moses, Luther, or many of the other "great leaders" anything to emulate.

--J.D.
Well Iagree with you on Madam Blavatsky but Moses was just as bad and more wrong to lead the Children of Israel into the promised land where they died nonetheless despite all the scriptures they burned to fuel the fire in their soul.
 
Old 08-03-2003, 10:53 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
Default Krishnamurti

"Damn the Pharisees! They are like a dog sleeping in the cattle manger: the dog neither eats nor [lets] the cattle eat."
(Jesus in the GOT)
Volker.Doormann is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 10:58 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 5,047
Thumbs up

Quote:
Madam Blavatsky was a charlatan, however.
As are all mystics and peddlers of the supernatural...your point?
Ronin is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 11:06 PM   #18
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ronin
As are all mystics and peddlers of the supernatural...your point?
Good point.
 
Old 08-03-2003, 11:37 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: J.Krishnamurti

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos
Hello Volker, maybe you forgot, or maybe you never knew, that Catholic children are exposed to the brilliance of heaven long before the lights are dimmed on them. The Church teaches and aims to instill virtue and piety in children knowing that it will make their Eden a brighter place to remember long before they are set free to get lost in their own jungle of life.

Hi Amos,
the simple truth is, that the catholic church has no right to take 9 year old girls, label them as brides of Christ with a penis/serpent symbol in the hand, which was taken from the Indian Shiva cult doormann.org/the0.htm, having no knowledge abut this crime ritual, and about the meaning of 'garden of joy' (woman's womb).
Quote:
You are right about the caused actions but I disagree that order can lead to truth. Let me show you how the Church employs our violence (Krishnamurti's definition) for its own end. In the allegory of Hansel and Grethel the breadcrumbs were deeds of righteousness that they had placed while going into the jungle of life. Of course when darkness came they were never to be found because it was darkness that had either consumed or overshadowed them. In other words, there is no return for the righteous because order becomes disorder or darkness would never be.
You miss the point, that the line of breadcrumbs does symbolize the thread, which connects the individual soul every time with the remote light. And this is the order. Light. As you can see well, if you are not blind or on day, you can find your true way back home from an order recognizable through light. If order would not related to truth, than disorder would related to truth.
Quote:
So more than anything, I advocate virtue and piety in children so that their days may be bright and a time to remember. If this is done well (don't ask me how), it will serve them as a direct link to Eden and hotline to heaven. If this, then it can be said that they are never really lost but only feel as if they are lost.
The mistaken idea in this is, that the catholic church is a phantom. There are individual fleshly men only wearing woman's clothes. I agree on that, that each individual child has the right to search for light and see the light, free from the bondage of fleshly unmarried authorities, knowing nothing about the bride chamber, knowing not, why Jesus has spoken about woman's, who do not bear children and breast them.

Volker
Volker.Doormann is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 11:47 PM   #20
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Amos:

Quote:
Well Iagree with you on Madam Blavatsky but Moses was just as bad and more wrong to lead the Children of Israel into the promised land where they died nonetheless despite all the scriptures they burned to fuel the fire in their soul.
Except Moses never had any existence.

Ronin:

Perhaps why the Buddhist proverb "if you see the Buddha on the side of the road--kill him!" applies.

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.