Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-08-2003, 08:13 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
|
Evolution-Perfection question.
Hello!
How can I explain to a person that evolution does not have a goal of creating "perfect" organisms? Thanks! |
06-08-2003, 09:12 AM | #2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 172
|
The word "goal" implies forethought. Evolution, a natural phenomenon, does not think. It does not plan for anything. Nature is no more than the elements of the universe in interaction with one another. The only thing guiding Nature are its laws, which do not include goals.
|
06-08-2003, 10:32 AM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Re: Evolution-Perfection question.
Quote:
doov . |
|
06-08-2003, 11:11 AM | #4 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern Maine, USA
Posts: 220
|
You could use the example that Richard Dawkins used in his book Climbing Mount Improbable. Basically, you take a rock, and start breeding from it. Keep throwing away, over a long period of time, the dull ones. Eventually if you keep doing that you'll get something that can give you a decent shave. Explain that evolution by natural selection is a mindless process that simply kills of defective organisms and leaves the fit ones to prosper.
|
06-08-2003, 01:14 PM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Evolution-Perfection question.
Hi Roller,
Quote:
|
|
06-08-2003, 02:38 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: A cave. On Mars.
Posts: 36
|
What exactly is meant by 'perfect'? This could have a major bearing on the way you argue this. If it were to be defined as something along the lines of 'evolution creates organisms that are perfectly suited to their environment' for example, this could be argued for.
|
06-08-2003, 03:00 PM | #7 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Evolution has no "goal".
I would also ask what is "perfect"? Note that the earth and its various environments change over time. Therefore, the "perfect" life form is one that can adapt to meet changes in the environment, or even adapt to spread to different environments. The evolutionary mechanisms provide that ability; thus, what is "perfect" for the changing earth/environments is what we find - life capable of evolving. Thus, no one species can ever be said to be in a "perfect" state (perhaps in a "well-fitted state"), for if the environment changes and the species does not, the species will die out. Evolution may be said to be "perfectly suited" for life in a changing environment! |
06-08-2003, 03:50 PM | #8 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 188
|
Being "perfect" is not required to survive. Evolution does not produce "perfect" results, just results that are good enough to survive.
|
06-08-2003, 06:53 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
|
Thank you all on your responses. Actually, the guy is not a "regular" creationist. He's ok with all of the evolution but he thinks that evolution is a process of making a perfect species (guided by God). I already tried the things you suggested. The problem is, I think I did it in a clumsy way. With these suggestions I can articulate what I want to say in a far better way.
Thank you all! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|