FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-20-2002, 04:48 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
Post Fundie horrors.

So, a Nigerian Sharia court has condemned a mother to death by stoning for the crime of adultery.
In the UK, our BBC Radio 4 Today programme had an interview with a Muslim academic who defended the sentence.
He failed to mention that while Sharia law requires four witnesses to testify against a man accused of adultery, an unmarried woman who’s pregnant or has given birth can’t be anything but guilty.
He did not justify the absurdity of a law which requires no less than four witnesses to one of the most private acts performed between a man and a woman, and he did not comment on the diminished likelihood of witnesses being present where the punishment for it is death by stoning.
This academic epitomised the religious Fundamentalist”s (Christian, Muslim, Hindu - whatever) perverse. sense of values which places religious dogma above Humanitarian principles.
Are they loathsome, or what?
Stephen T-B is offline  
Old 08-20-2002, 09:27 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,656
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Stephen T-B:
<strong>Are they loathsome, or what?</strong>
No, they just love the Lord above all else.

cavite ne illam vitam securam ematis pro vita post illam - beware lest you trade this sure life for a life after this one.

[ August 20, 2002: Message edited by: Heathen Dawn ]</p>
Heathen Dawn is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:23 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.