sophie

King Rat
If you think this is bad you should see my handwriting. The things I could fit on a page.

King Rat
I am not peddling anything, except good humor, a little irony, big logic from reality, a keen sense of the impossibility of classifying the unknown, other than this, I don't see any problems intellectual or philosophical. The only thing I see in front of me is the bully pulpit I wanna clamour over.

King Rat

I'm not a bully, I'm an asshole.

The problem is using one godboy's premise to check the conclusion generated by another godboy. It's like using the bible to prove that the bible is true.

winstonjen

Why, afterlife blackmail, of course. Simply dress up as an appropriate religious authority figure, then watch them bow down like *#Y$*&s.

sophie

Docter X : I guess health care is on the down shift. Everytime you bash omniGOD, you bash your own ineffectivness in dealing with startling reality. (a non sequitor, but additional information for you to ponder).

But on a more reasonable and serious note, if such a predetermined plan included the intentional suffering of some pretty little angelic eyed babe in a cradle, then I would have to agree, children crying out in endless and eternal pain is somewhat heart rendering. Perhaps a little kindness on the part of the human soldier may help. However seeing the brave and courageous soldiers of Earth are usually rendered meek in the face of such suffering by innocent children, the omniGOD should at the earliest opportunity render the life force on the planet ineffective and irrelevant to cosmic development.

This inaction on the part of the omniGOD does place doubt on the willingness of omniGOD to aid humanity on Earth. If omniGOD then exists and such inaction is of notable concern to some, there may be a small implication we could be in HELL. By that I mean somewhere where one has to fend for oneself without omniPAMPERING.

Otherwise one does have logical impulse to call omniGOD any combination of names available in the universe, including, evil, ineffective, incompetent, or just plainly non-existent.

However if omniGOD does exist, and because of omniGOD's inaction you believe omniGOD to be evil, incompetent or ineffective then I would have to say, omniGOD's fucking ya up man
and as such, the ball is now in your court to initiate some sort of class action. You should therefore go hunt omniGOD, and take care of the bastards (note the plural).

(by the way, this omniGOD friend of yours was in my bed last night)

love

Sophie

sophie

King Rat :

In that case I'll pass on the clamouring over you bit.

King Rat :
Well then why not use not(Bible) to show Bible.

However on a more serious note, if we continue to talk the omniTALK, then the premises and conclusions are exchangable by definition. One godboy would have no more truth or no less truth from the other godboy. In actual fact this is a perfect testament to check the consistencies of the two.

winstonjen

Have you ever heard of guilt by omission? An omnimax being would be responsible for everything by default, through commission or omission.

Doctor X

I, myself, only bash my ineffectiveness with coordinated independence. As for the health care profession, it never claim divine power.

More specifically, it would prove Evil if a deity wanted it, Incompetence if a deity could not avoid it, or Irrelevance if a deity could do nothing about it.

Even the most kindness cannot remove the responsibility of a deity--unless he is really non-existent.

Mitigating the extent and duration of suffering cause by such a case hardly meets the criteria for "pampering."

What follows is not really relevant nor helpful to the discussion.

I can only hope she misspelled "Oh MY GOD!!!"

--J.D.

sophie

Docter X : that individuality has to possibly bear a heavy burden in its development.

Once we claim omniGOD is dedicated to "free will", we must then examine all possible choices when this very same "free will" becomes retarded, even if faced with the "will of omniGOD". One possibility could be that omniGOD suggestion which indicates time on Earth is in a futile duration cycle and as such reasonable individual action should be attempted.

Note the omniGOD intervention is an intellectual one. Something like "time", if you can read me clearly.

By the way sorry to hi-jack your excellent point.

sophie

winstonjen : But you also missed, "not-responsible" due to being an omniMAX being. SO we re-write this as :

Where does this leave US?

winstonjen

Where does this leave US? [/QUOTE]

I think it just leaves you with a lot of dogma, and it leaves me (and your opponents on this debate) with a lot of non-sequitors to sort through.