FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2002, 04:22 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Post Falwell and IRS guidelines on church politicking

Jerry Falwell has send out an alert to ministers telling them to go ahead and endorse candidates from the pulpit:

<a href="http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/2002/10/03_Falwell.html" target="_blank">text of Falwell's letter</a>

Quote:
FALWELL CONFIDENTIAL

DATE: October 3, 2002
FROM: Jerry Falwell

ATTENTION ALL PASTORS: You May Endorse Candidates and Your Church May Distribute Voter Guides

. . . If you are a pastor, you will no doubt soon be receiving your perennial "scare letter" from Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. He writes many evangelical pastors each election year, warning them that they will lose their tax-exempt status if they comment on the upcoming elections, distribute "Voter Guides" or, God forbid, endorse a candidate.

. . .
Liberal groups are using this week's defeat of Rep. Walter B. Jones' "Houses of Worship Political Speech Protection Act" (H.R. 2357) as a means to proclaim that pastors must painstakingly avoid political issues in their pulpits. That bill, which needed a two-thirds vote for passage, was defeated 239-178 (with 15 not voting). While the bill failed, 178 votes is a great beginning toward the ultimate passage of this important religious freedom bill.

The Jones bill was designed to annul a 48-year-old law that prohibits all tax-exempt groups - including churches - from participating in political activity under the threat of loss of tax-exempt status. However, it is important to note that only one church in the history of our nation has ever lost its tax-exempt status because of political wrongdoings. And in that case - wherein a pastor irresponsibly purchased billboards and newspaper ads telling people not to vote for Bill Clinton - the loss of tax-exempt status lasted for only an hour before being returned.

To hear Barry Lynn tell it, pastors must now avoid political issues at all costs when addressing their parishioners. He said, "This bill may have been the Religious Right's dream, but it was a nightmare for anyone concerned with the integrity of houses of worship and the political process." Remember, this is a man who would stifle virtually every religious phrase in the American public square.

The truth is, while Rep. Jones' bill would have afforded desirable government protection of pastors who speak out on moral and political issues without fear of Internal Revenue Service retribution, pastors nonetheless retain an absolute right to speak out on political/social issues in their churches.

Indeed, the left has influenced many - even many in the Congress - to falsely believe that America's clerics must maintain unconditional silence on issues such as abortion, homosexual rights, pornography and other ills of our society. (Of course, liberal ministers and church leaders are often afforded singular freedoms to speak out on these same issues.) In this age of moral relativism, it remains imperative that pastors vocally instruct their congregations on the key issues of our day.

I talked yesterday with Grover Norquist, a great conservative and president of Americans For Tax Reform. Mr. Norquist was excited that he had finally convinced the Internal Revenue Service to publish the specifics of what pastors and churches may and may not legally do in election campaigns. I urge all pastors and church leaders to visit the Web site of Americans for Tax Reform (<a href="http://www.atr.org" target="_blank">www.atp.org</a>) to learn what is and is not appropriate in regard to church and government involvement. Mr. Norquist and his team pressed the IRS to define, in detail, to what extent tax-exempt religious organizations may properly be involved in the political process. The answers are clearly spelled out on their Web site under the headline, "Know Your Rights!" Every pastor should read this important 25-page document to learn how to properly address political/social issues.

Here are a few excerpts of what every pastor and church may legally do:

* Churches may distribute non-partisan voter guides describing candidates' stands on the issues.

* Churches may engage in non-partisan voter registration drives;

* Pastors may endorse candidates from the pulpit as long as they make it clear they are doing so as individuals - not as a church endorsement;

* Churches may invite candidates to attend and speak at events as long as they make the offer available to all candidates for the same office. It is not required that all candidates attend, but rather that they all have the same opportunity to do so;

* A local church may not endorse a candidate, only the pastor as an individual may do so;

* Pastors may urge their congregations to write, E-mail or call their elected representatives to lobby for specific legislation;

* Churches may engage in active lobbying as long as the amount is not "substantial" ("Substantial" has been defined by the courts as 5% of a person's/organization's time or resources.)

I urge 200,000 evangelical pastors and church leaders to "render unto Caesar" on November 5th by advising their 70 million parishioners to cast "Christian" votes for the men and women who best represent their biblical values.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-04-2002, 04:32 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: southern california
Posts: 1,002
Post




I don't think this is what jerry had in mind?

[ October 04, 2002: Message edited by: cydonia ]</p>
cydonia is offline  
Old 10-10-2002, 07:27 PM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 430
Post

I talked yesterday with Grover Norquist...

I'm wondering, are many of you folks familiar with who this guy really is that the good Rev. Falwell is so chummy with on the phone?
ybnormal is offline  
Old 10-10-2002, 09:38 PM   #4
Beloved Deceased
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: central Florida
Posts: 3,546
Post

One of the more comprehensive looks at him.

<a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20010514&s=dreyfuss" target="_blank">http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20010514&s=dreyfuss</a>
Buffman is offline  
Old 10-11-2002, 05:22 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,759
Post

I've made the mistake of watching Hagee and James Kennedy on Sunday mornings recently. All they preach is revisionist Christian reconstructionist politics. Every sermon has at least a bit of politics. Some sermons are all politics.
scombrid is offline  
Old 10-11-2002, 07:30 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by ybnormal:
<strong>I talked yesterday with Grover Norquist...

I'm wondering, are many of you folks familiar with who this guy really is that the good Rev. Falwell is so chummy with on the phone?</strong>
I don't know if your question is rhetorical or not, but Norquist is a right-wing strategist who is responsible for much of the underhanded tactics of the current far right-wing power base. He purportedly has a portrait of Lenin above his mantle and is fond of repeating Lenin's quote about "let us probe with bayonets, looking for weakness...". He has no truck with softy conservatives who don't want to "hurt" the enemy. In Norquist's eyes this is War, and the Left is the Evil Empire that must be deposed at all costs, no matter what the casualties or consequences. Basically, he's largely responsible for the poisoned politics that came to dominate with the Gingrinch revolution.

theyeti
theyeti is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.