Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-02-2002, 03:17 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
What God cannot do?
Well, according to QM, God, after determined the actual momentum of a particle is incapable of measuring the precise position of the particle at the same time no matter how much effort and power He used. So much for the omnipotence of the One.
|
07-02-2002, 04:09 AM | #2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 368
|
Actually, I like the hypothetical:
Can God create an object that he cannot move? Either way, it shows that God cannot be omnipotent. |
07-02-2002, 04:25 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: US and UK
Posts: 846
|
Quote:
|
|
07-02-2002, 04:36 AM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
Quote:
|
|
07-02-2002, 06:37 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: US and UK
Posts: 846
|
Quote:
|
|
07-02-2002, 06:03 PM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
Quote:
Furthermore, you, yourself, have shown us the fact that not even God could control the randomness in nature. |
|
07-03-2002, 01:53 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: US and UK
Posts: 846
|
Quote:
The point I'm making is that pink isn't a property of sounds, and having a definite value of position and momentum isn't a property of particles. You can only frame the question because our language is an approximation deduced from macroscopic things with doubtful application at the quantum level. |
|
07-03-2002, 06:18 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
Quote:
You can't shift all blame to our 'languages' if you wish but the fact still remain that God can't do what was a simple requirement of him. |
|
07-03-2002, 07:25 PM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
|
Answerer, if you read the numerous discussions on omnipotence, you will notice that most of them are mainly regarding semantics, definitions & wording. Yes, the English language is highly relevant to this line of reasoning.
Can God make a rock too heavy for Him to lift ? If you wish to demonstrate that this anti-logic is proof of God’s non-existence, so be it. But I’d suggest that EoG has many threads with more substance. I share a common opinion that the word omnipotence is of little value to anybody unless one spends 200 pages defining it, & frankly my attention span is not up to the task. |
07-03-2002, 09:32 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 808
|
Interesting!
Lets extend the cat experiment a bit, shall we? We set up a doomsday machine, capable of destroying all life on earth, and put it in the control of a device which depended on quantum effects to either trigger the doomsday machine or not. Could GOD ALMIGHTY predict the results of this? if he can, something is wrong with QM, and thus with all the devices we have which depend on its effects. If he can not, he is not all powerful. The only way out is to claim god has a back door to QM for just such a situation. Until such a back door is discovered, omnimax beings are Not Possible in our universe, Period! [ July 03, 2002: Message edited by: Christopher Lord ]</p> |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|