FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-22-2002, 06:49 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nashville, USA
Posts: 949
Red face

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus_Finch:
<strong>My gut reaction, is to be a young earther. BUT, I believe that sincere, committed Christians who believe in the authority of scripture can believe in evolution and such.

I hope that answers your question.

Regards,

Finch</strong>
BLASPHEMER!!! RC Sproul and John MacArthur Jr. would have serious concerns with you!

From our perspective though, you're beginning to talk like a Catholic....so you're halfway back to reality.

Hang around, AF....we DO care about the salvation of your intellect!
MOJO-JOJO is offline  
Old 03-23-2002, 05:27 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Manila
Posts: 5,516
Post

Regarding what Mojo Mojo described as "Blasphemer", It might be a good idea for Atticus F. to explain what he meant by bible authority and evolution can be reconciled in a person. That's a stupendous statement.
Ruy Lopez is offline  
Old 03-23-2002, 08:36 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus_Finch:
I am an attorney and trial lawyer. I work with the concept of evidence every day.
....
I find that many non-believers apply an incredibly high standard of proof to questions of religion which I can not imagine that they apply to other similar questions of life.
With all due respect, do you not agree that standards of proof for metaphysical claims must necessarily be higher, or at least different?

For example, since you've suggested you're a "young earther," how does Bishop Ussher's calculation of the age of the universe compare with our empirical observations of light emanating from sources hundreds of millions of light-years away? Does one not require an arbitrary manipulation of the laws of physics in order to conform with Ussher's claim?
hezekiah jones is offline  
Old 03-23-2002, 10:50 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sarver, PA, USA
Posts: 920
Post

Welcome, Atticus! Step right this way, to the deconversion chamber. You seem like a rather bright and inquisitive fellow, so you have my best regards. I hope that you will find your salvation here.
Wyrdsmyth is offline  
Old 03-23-2002, 12:19 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Post

Get thee back. I'm the only Atticus around here!

-RvFvS
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 03-23-2002, 12:22 PM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus_Finch:
<strong>
Excellent question. I have been giving deep thought to this issue for some time. On the one hand, a young earth argument is easier from a biblical point of view. It does not require the twists and contortions of the text required by the day-ager or those who believe Genesis is mere allegory. On the other hand, in our society it certainly would be simpler to try to conform the bible to the popular science of the day. I call it the "popular science of the day" because although scientific knowledge seems very solid today, we have only to look back in history and see the many things we once firmly believed, based on science, were wrong. It would be supreme arrogance to assume that our children's children will not think we were ignorant simpletons.</strong>
I invite you to visit the Evolution/Creation forum. A literal interpretation of genesis was disproven generations ago. There is absolutly no chance for it to come back, unless all the evidence we observe is a figment of our imagination.

-RvFvS
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 03-24-2002, 09:36 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,107
Post

Quote:
My favorite scene in To Kill A Mockingbird is after Atticus has lost the case and he is preparing to leave the courtroom. Scout and the black community are waiting in the balcony. As Atticus walks out the Reverend says to Scout, "Stand up...your father is passing." (or something close to that). Very powerfull stuff.
Welcome Atticus-Finch. I have a first edition of TKAMB. It was a well-loved, well-read book of this family.

Edited to add: I would advise you to gird your loins well before entering the E-C board.
[ March 24, 2002: Message edited by: Oresta ]

[ March 24, 2002: Message edited by: Oresta ]</p>
Oresta is offline  
Old 03-24-2002, 09:55 AM   #38
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Post

Quote:
posted by Atticus_Finch:
I also think that I can challenge the foundation of those who do not believe.
I'm still waiting..
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 07:14 AM   #39
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 392
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by hezekiahjones:
<strong>

With all due respect, do you not agree that standards of proof for metaphysical claims must necessarily be higher, or at least different?

For example, since you've suggested you're a "young earther," how does Bishop Ussher's calculation of the age of the universe compare with our empirical observations of light emanating from sources hundreds of millions of light-years away? Does one not require an arbitrary manipulation of the laws of physics in order to conform with Ussher's claim?</strong>
The question of "old light" is a tough one for the "young earth" theory. I am not aware of a fully satisfactory theory to explain that problem. It therefore fits into the "we don't know that yet" category. I must note, however, that evolutionary and materialist theories also include a great deal of "we don't know that yet" answers as well (i.e. how exactly did we go from no life to life, the first and all important step in evolutionary theory).

Regards,

Finch
Atticus_Finch is offline  
Old 03-25-2002, 07:15 AM   #40
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 392
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by RufusAtticus:
<strong>

I invite you to visit the Evolution/Creation forum. A literal interpretation of genesis was disproven generations ago. There is absolutly no chance for it to come back, unless all the evidence we observe is a figment of our imagination.

-RvFvS</strong>

I am extremely interested to know the literal interpretation of genesis was disproven generations ago. Please explain.

Regards,

The one true Atticus
Atticus_Finch is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.