FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-15-2003, 03:07 PM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Georgia, United States of America
Posts: 115
Default Question

Greetings everyone, I'm new to the forums and would like to introduce myself. Hi, names' Leviathan, and you can note my profile if you're interested.

So which part of this county's proposal violates the Lemon Test?
Leviathan is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 03:49 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Hi Leviathan - welcome to the boards. Your profile says you are a Christian relativist/nihilist? Have you introduced yourself in the lounge where you can explain this intellectual feat?

As for which part of the Lemon test that is being violated - how about entanglement? how about lack of a secular purpose? (The member who said "kids need Christianity" has supplied some helpful evidence for the ACLU.)
Toto is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 04:05 PM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Georgia, United States of America
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Toto
Hi Leviathan - welcome to the boards. Your profile says you are a Christian relativist/nihilist? Have you introduced yourself in the lounge where you can explain this intellectual feat?
Hi Toto, nice to meet you. I have not entered the lounge, as I didn't know of such an area. I'll not get the thread off topic, and will answer you in a pm, if you wish to have such an answer to your question.

Quote:

As for which part of the Lemon test that is being violated - how about entanglement? how about lack of a secular purpose? (The member who said "kids need Christianity" has supplied some helpful evidence for the ACLU.)
My understanding of the Augusta school proposal does not isolate anything, in my opinion, which would "entangle" the school's proposal (the state action) with that of religious instrument. The program is after school, or maybe the last 45 minutes of it, I'm not sure on that, and it doesn't seem any employees would be "burdened" with the lecturing of religious doctrine. Additionally, the latest Seperation of Church and State cases are distancing themselves from the argument, so I'm not sure what credibility there would be in claiming that it violates that Lemon prong.

Now the lack of a secular purpose is a more strong argument. The statement "kids need Christianity," to my knowledge, isn't very damning, given it isn't really a statement reflective of the legislative intent. The legislative intent is merely to provide a way for kids in school, who *want* to be in such a club, the chance to. Is this not in line with the 90' decision (mind block on name) which said that equal opportunity to be in any amount of clubs, so long as no club is privileged over another, is constitutional?

I'm not big on First Amendment jurisprudence, but that is my take on the situation. Any court cases/citations at all would be helpful. Thank you.
Leviathan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:54 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.