Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-15-2003, 03:07 PM | #11 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Georgia, United States of America
Posts: 115
|
Question
Greetings everyone, I'm new to the forums and would like to introduce myself. Hi, names' Leviathan, and you can note my profile if you're interested.
So which part of this county's proposal violates the Lemon Test? |
07-15-2003, 03:49 PM | #12 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Hi Leviathan - welcome to the boards. Your profile says you are a Christian relativist/nihilist? Have you introduced yourself in the lounge where you can explain this intellectual feat?
As for which part of the Lemon test that is being violated - how about entanglement? how about lack of a secular purpose? (The member who said "kids need Christianity" has supplied some helpful evidence for the ACLU.) |
07-15-2003, 04:05 PM | #13 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Georgia, United States of America
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
Quote:
Now the lack of a secular purpose is a more strong argument. The statement "kids need Christianity," to my knowledge, isn't very damning, given it isn't really a statement reflective of the legislative intent. The legislative intent is merely to provide a way for kids in school, who *want* to be in such a club, the chance to. Is this not in line with the 90' decision (mind block on name) which said that equal opportunity to be in any amount of clubs, so long as no club is privileged over another, is constitutional? I'm not big on First Amendment jurisprudence, but that is my take on the situation. Any court cases/citations at all would be helpful. Thank you. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|