FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-27-2003, 10:00 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,113
Default

I guess I am! I think it's fascinating that there could still be things that can never be defined as existing, nor even presumed as rational premises. There is a whole other world outside the program, infinitely larger and more complex, and the digital people are incapable of perceiving it in any way or even imagining what it could be like with their digital brains. When they "die," their binary sequence disperses in the program. Can there be anything left? Can self-aware consciousness survive without the ones and zeros which define it? Could it leave the confines of the programed rules? Probably not in the analogy. It doesn't seem like it in this universe either, but then again, I'm not the programmer so I am not fully aware of the rules.
long winded fool is offline  
Old 07-27-2003, 11:26 AM   #42
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pa
Posts: 76
Default

My 5 year old daughter gave an appropriate response to the 'Can an all powerful God make a rock so big that He can't lift it' riddle. She said, "Mom, I can't give you a smart answer to a dumb question."

A genius should be able to successfully pass any test that he is given, even a test that would qualify him as an idiot.

A.S.A. Jones
Hired Gun is offline  
Old 07-27-2003, 03:34 PM   #43
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hired Gun
My 5 year old daughter gave an appropriate response to the 'Can an all powerful God make a rock so big that He can't lift it' riddle. She said, "Mom, I can't give you a smart answer to a dumb question."
That's nice, but what was her response to the riddle?

Quote:
A genius should be able to successfully pass any test that he is given, even a test that would qualify him as an idiot.

A.S.A. Jones
You have an odd definition of a genius. Most of us would define a genius as a really smart person - i.e. one who would not be taking a test that qualifies them as an idiot.
Jinto is offline  
Old 07-27-2003, 03:58 PM   #44
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pa
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jinto
That's nice, but what was her response to the riddle?



You have an odd definition of a genius. Most of us would define a genius as a really smart person - i.e. one who would not be taking a test that qualifies them as an idiot.
An all powerful God would not do something that would compromise His omnipotence. The question is actually asking, 'if one is the greatest, can one be greater than oneself?' The flaw lies in the question, not the answer. The bit of illogic involved relies on the limits of language and results in ambiguity.

A.S.A. Jones
Hired Gun is offline  
Old 07-27-2003, 04:40 PM   #45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 957
Default

Is not infinity = infinity + 1?
Jinto is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 09:31 PM   #46
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tx
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jinto
Is not infinity = infinity + 1?
No, because the latter of the two will always be one more ahead of the first. 100000000 is not equal to 100000000+1
Majody is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 09:36 PM   #47
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Between here and there
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jinto
Is not infinity = infinity + 1?
Not really. Subtracting infinity from both sides would mean that 0 = 1. You can't really treat infinity like a quantity or a variable and have it make any mathematical sense.
Quantum Ninja is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 10:13 PM   #48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Quantum Ninja
Not really. Subtracting infinity from both sides would mean that 0 = 1. You can't really treat infinity like a quantity or a variable and have it make any mathematical sense.
Then how is it that people *couchhiredguncough* treat infinity as a person and expect it to make any sense of any type?
Jinto is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 12:14 AM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Champaign, IL or Boston, MA
Posts: 6,360
Default

Put it this way... lim (x--> inf) x+1 = lim (x--> inf) x

Infinity is not a number, you can't add it or subtract it or mutliply it or anything. You have to deal with limits.
xorbie is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 07:26 AM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Lauderale, FL
Posts: 5,390
Default

Quote:
Not really. Subtracting infinity from both sides would mean that 0 = 1.
Actually, subtracting infinity from both sides would leave:
-infinity = -infinity+1
in other words, why would subtracting infinity stop at zero?

However:
"You can't really treat infinity like a quantity or a variable and have it make any mathematical sense."

is valid anyway.
Llyricist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.