Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-01-2002, 09:57 PM | #11 |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
wow goody2shoes...are you confused about who has the huge ego? Let's see...is it more arrogant to feel we are a cosmic accident as danny boy here does, or that an all powerful superbeing created it all just for us humans because we are the end all be all of existence?
Danny...if you don't believe in a supernatural deity you can be considered an athiest...or you may be more comfortable with "I don't know" and be agnostic...or you may think an alien quantum experiment went awry and we are some sort of bug and call yourself a thylostigan....what best fits your understanding of the world/universe and your place in it? |
07-01-2002, 10:13 PM | #12 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
|
Quote:
|
|
07-02-2002, 03:00 AM | #13 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 712
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
07-02-2002, 06:09 AM | #14 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 335
|
Quote:
Apart from my belief in an 'external event' i suppose agnosticism comes close to what i believe but this world view is something i would definately have to explore further before attempting to relate it to my own view. Atheism , with its quite specific reference to a deity is something about which i can be a lot more confident in ascribing too.Definately lots for me to think about. |
|
07-02-2002, 06:13 AM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,059
|
Danny,
I believe the universe is 'pointless' and that the creation of the universe was an 'accident' (in the sense of no intelligence behind it, not created to evolve towards some goal, and so on), for two main reasons: 1) I have seen much evidence for the blind nature of the universe's mechanisms (like evolution), but little that would seem to indicate there's some god out there who has a purpose for us, much less a purpose that involves us being happy. 2) It is what I want to understand (it makes me feel at home, as you said). I do call myself an agnostic rather than an atheist because I'm not entirely sure, I keep telling myself that this, too, is a belief, and other such reasons. I also am interested in theistic arguments that might convince me, though the arguments for deities like the Invisible Pink Unicorn and Eris Discordia have been the most convincing I've seen so far . I think you're an atheist, if you lack a belief in a deity and wish to choose that label. Welcome to II! -Perchance. |
07-02-2002, 09:16 AM | #16 |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
danny said
Thylostigan is a new one on me , cant seem to find a definition at hand , but it sounds fascinating. It was a joke, son....Thylostigan is not a word. I was trying to point out it doesn't matter what label you choose...everyone's understanding is what it is, some of us are able to identify with a convenient label...others can't or won't. |
07-02-2002, 09:21 AM | #17 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
Have you ever tried that for any length of time, Danny? Goody |
|
07-02-2002, 09:39 AM | #18 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 335
|
Quote:
|
|
07-02-2002, 12:30 PM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
|
Quote:
<a href="http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/einsci.htm" target="_blank">http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/einsci.htm</a> |
|
07-02-2002, 12:43 PM | #20 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 58
|
There might well be some sort of overall process going on of which we are not aware, but if it exists it is very probably just another natural force, just one we can't detect.
For example, in the Mars trilogy, Kim Stanley Robinson (dude) raises the idea of viriditas, which is a kind of force that opposes entropy, ie it promotes order rather than disorder, thus promoting the building up of complex structures (like us). Someone could believe in that kind of force and still be an atheist, just as believing in gravity doesn't mean you believe in a god. Hope that made sense, HtH P.S. I love that song, Hayden. Ah... Monty Python... bliss. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|