Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-02-2003, 11:39 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 308
|
Vision and evolution
Like many upright primates my vision is not perfect and I need corrective lenses. I wear contacts because only virgin nerds wear glasses. Anyway, before Ben Franklin gave the world glasses there must have been many people whose vision was less than perfect. How did these people survive? I'd imagine that the travails of life would have wiped them out: the hunt for food, fighting wars blindly, dating the ugly girl because you just can't see the difference. How were my visually impaired ancestors able to fornicate and pass on bad vision without being eradicated from the gene pool?
|
07-02-2003, 11:54 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California
Posts: 646
|
I've often wondered the same thing, having needed glasses from the age of like 8 or something.
I always thought that maybe it was an effect of civilization, e.g. I was a kid who stayed up late reading by a dim light every night. But that's probably bunkum, I have no idea. Vision problems later in life are easier to explain, your average neolithic schmoe was very old if they made it to the age of 30, let alone survived childhood... |
07-03-2003, 12:22 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 710
|
I would think that if one lives in a tribe one could get by with poor vision as there would be other jobs that a person could do for the tribe.
|
07-03-2003, 12:58 AM | #4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 884
|
Re: Vision and evolution
Quote:
What Franklin invented was the bifocals, reducing the need for two pairs of glasses, one for tasks involving near objects and the other for seeing far objects. Generally, only older people need them and people didn't use to live that old -and if they did they had already passed their genes in any case. Quote:
Other factors have been more important, especially in finding a mate. If you are a gorgeous hunk or a fusion-hot babe, you don't need to see well to pass the genes (although having sexy spectacles does improve the chance...), it is enough that somebody else sees how sexy you are |
||
07-03-2003, 12:59 AM | #5 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Myopia has increased drastically with modern civilization. Current speculation is that myopia is related to the consumption of refined starches and sugar, and the resulting insulin reaction.
Myopia linked to bread Quote:
Quote:
|
||
07-03-2003, 08:42 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: rochester, ny, usa
Posts: 658
|
Quote:
you're right that bifocals correct presbyopia, but presbyopia is not what's commonly referred to as far sightedness... that's hyperopia (myopia being near sightedness). and, unfortunately, all humans will become presbyopic as they age (that is, their naturally crystalline lenses become more rigid with age, and the accommodative mechanism that was originally able to deform them to change their power simply becomes less and less effective). -gary |
|
07-03-2003, 08:54 AM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 6th Circle of Hell
Posts: 1,093
|
I'm glad I got my mom's (former) vision. My dad and my brother need glasses, my mom only needs them cuz she's aging . I am rather near-sighted in my left eye though, and slightly far-sighted in my right. I guess it balances out...
|
07-03-2003, 09:24 AM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 2,362
|
Seems to me that the need for really good vision has only arisen with reading. There are very few people who have such poor eyesight that tasks other than reading (or othe things that humans inflict upon themselves) are diffcult for them.
Of course, I have fighter-pilot eyes, so this is all idle speculation (what a pun) for me. |
07-03-2003, 11:26 AM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Deep within the recesses of a twisted mind
Posts: 74
|
I would think that one with poor vision, would be able to perform tasks other than hunting. Like basket weaving for instance. Or gathering fruits
With the protection of your tribe/social group you wouldnt need perfect vision. The others will cover you, nd scream and shout if a large cat was stalking you. for the recod my vision is 20/250 |
07-03-2003, 11:57 AM | #10 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Regardless of the survival disadvantages of innately poor vision, it appears to be more a product of environment than heredity.
In traditional societies that stick to a traditional diet, there are few vision problems in younger people. The older people with deteriorating vision are supported by the younger people because of their accumulated knowldedge. I still think that the human eye is proof that there was no intelligent designer behind the human body. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|