FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-02-2003, 11:39 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 308
Default Vision and evolution

Like many upright primates my vision is not perfect and I need corrective lenses. I wear contacts because only virgin nerds wear glasses. Anyway, before Ben Franklin gave the world glasses there must have been many people whose vision was less than perfect. How did these people survive? I'd imagine that the travails of life would have wiped them out: the hunt for food, fighting wars blindly, dating the ugly girl because you just can't see the difference. How were my visually impaired ancestors able to fornicate and pass on bad vision without being eradicated from the gene pool?
Zimyatin is offline  
Old 07-02-2003, 11:54 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California
Posts: 646
Default

I've often wondered the same thing, having needed glasses from the age of like 8 or something.

I always thought that maybe it was an effect of civilization, e.g. I was a kid who stayed up late reading by a dim light every night. But that's probably bunkum, I have no idea.

Vision problems later in life are easier to explain, your average neolithic schmoe was very old if they made it to the age of 30, let alone survived childhood...
Nic Tamzek is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 12:22 AM   #3
Kuu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 710
Default

I would think that if one lives in a tribe one could get by with poor vision as there would be other jobs that a person could do for the tribe.
Kuu is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 12:58 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 884
Default Re: Vision and evolution

Quote:
Originally posted by Zimyatin
Anyway, before Ben Franklin gave the world glasses
First, Franklin did not invent the glasses. As early as 1289 a man wrote "I am so debilitated by age that without the glasses known as spectacles, I would no longer be able to read or write. These have recently been invented for the benefit of poor old people whose sight has become weak" The chinese may have knwon them ever longer. There are paintings from the 14th centurty featuring glasses.

What Franklin invented was the bifocals, reducing the need for two pairs of glasses, one for tasks involving near objects and the other for seeing far objects. Generally, only older people need them and people didn't use to live that old -and if they did they had already passed their genes in any case.

Quote:

there must have been many people whose vision was less than perfect. How did these people survive? I'd imagine that the travails of life would have wiped them out: the hunt for food, fighting wars blindly, dating the ugly girl because you just can't see the difference. How were my visually impaired ancestors able to fornicate and pass on bad vision without being eradicated from the gene pool?
They didn't need perfect vision to survive. Only very bad vision would be seriously impairing in most of the tasks you list, and as human beings live in communities and do things in groups, those with poor vision could do those jobs where vision is not that important.

Other factors have been more important, especially in finding a mate. If you are a gorgeous hunk or a fusion-hot babe, you don't need to see well to pass the genes (although having sexy spectacles does improve the chance...), it is enough that somebody else sees how sexy you are
Ovazor is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 12:59 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Myopia has increased drastically with modern civilization. Current speculation is that myopia is related to the consumption of refined starches and sugar, and the resulting insulin reaction.

Myopia linked to bread

Quote:
Bread and cereal could be helping to make western children short-sighted. Diets high in refined starches, such as breads and cereals, increase insulin levels which affect the development of the eyeball, say scientists.
The eyeball becomes abnormally long, leading to short-sightedness due to the lens failing to focus a sharp image on the retina, suggests a team of US and Australian experts.

The theory could help to explain the big increase in myopia in developed countries over the past 200 years, New Scientist magazine reported yesterday.

. . .

Evidence of the trend may be seen in Inuit and Pacific islanders. While less than 1% of these people had myopia in the past century, their rates have since rocketed, in some cases to 50%.

This has been blamed on the increase in reading following the sudden advent of literacy and compulsory schooling in such societies. But reading does not explain why the incidence of myopia has remained low in communities that have adopted western lifestyles but not western diets, say the scientists.
Nearsightedness linked to sugar

Quote:
Studies carried out in hunter-gatherer societies and in recently westernized hunter-gatherer groups indicate that the prevalence of myopia normally occurs in 0-2% of the population, and most refractive errors are less than minor. Moderate to high myopia is either non-existent or occurs in about one person out of a thousand.

Diets high in refined starches such as breads and cereals increase insulin levels. This affects the development of the eyeball, making it abnormally long and causing short-sightedness, suggests a team led by Loren Cordain, an evolutionary biologist at Colorado State University in Fort Collins.

When these hunter-gatherer societies change their lifestyles and introduce grains and carbohydrates, they rapidly develop (within a single generation) myopia rates that equal or exceed those in western societies.
Edited to add: the spectacles that Franklin developed were for presbyopia (far sightedness), which develops with age, usually starting after 40, after our paleolithic ancestors typical life span. A different phenomenon.
Toto is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 08:42 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: rochester, ny, usa
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Toto
Edited to add: the spectacles that Franklin developed were for presbyopia (far sightedness), which develops with age, usually starting after 40, after our paleolithic ancestors typical life span. A different phenomenon.
not often do i get to correct the folks around here

you're right that bifocals correct presbyopia, but presbyopia is not what's commonly referred to as far sightedness... that's hyperopia (myopia being near sightedness). and, unfortunately, all humans will become presbyopic as they age (that is, their naturally crystalline lenses become more rigid with age, and the accommodative mechanism that was originally able to deform them to change their power simply becomes less and less effective).

-gary
cloudyphiz is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 08:54 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 6th Circle of Hell
Posts: 1,093
Default

I'm glad I got my mom's (former) vision. My dad and my brother need glasses, my mom only needs them cuz she's aging . I am rather near-sighted in my left eye though, and slightly far-sighted in my right. I guess it balances out...
Spaz is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 09:24 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 2,362
Default

Seems to me that the need for really good vision has only arisen with reading. There are very few people who have such poor eyesight that tasks other than reading (or othe things that humans inflict upon themselves) are diffcult for them.

Of course, I have fighter-pilot eyes, so this is all idle speculation (what a pun) for me.
Undercurrent is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 11:26 AM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Deep within the recesses of a twisted mind
Posts: 74
Default

I would think that one with poor vision, would be able to perform tasks other than hunting. Like basket weaving for instance. Or gathering fruits

With the protection of your tribe/social group you wouldnt need perfect vision. The others will cover you, nd scream and shout if a large cat was stalking you.

for the recod my vision is 20/250
LogicMage is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 11:57 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Regardless of the survival disadvantages of innately poor vision, it appears to be more a product of environment than heredity.

In traditional societies that stick to a traditional diet, there are few vision problems in younger people. The older people with deteriorating vision are supported by the younger people because of their accumulated knowldedge.

I still think that the human eye is proof that there was no intelligent designer behind the human body.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:21 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.