Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-30-2003, 03:23 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
|
Continental Europe vs. Great Britain
or Hume vs. Rousseau
In another forum someone said that I should avoid Rousseau as much as possible, because he is a jerk. He was able to piss everybody off, including Hume. "He was able to piss Hume..." That is true but only half the story; the other half is that Hume pissed Rousseau, too*. The two were an odd couple from the start, why Hume invited Rousseau to England is beyond me. Hume was, in my opinion, the Philosopher of Industrial England. On the other hand, Rousseau was calling for a return to nature--though he mellowed as the years passed. 'NOW, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!' This was a speech of Thomas Gradgrind, the main character of C. Dickens's Hard Times; but it might as well been, Hume's speech. Like Thomas Gradgrind, Hume saw no benefit in things not planted on facts. He even advocated that such books "be condemned to flame." Rousseau was repulsed by this idea. He knew that talking dogs and other myth have their uses. In his Emile, he saw that these stories were important in developing a child's imagination. From a modern perspective, we can say Rousseau was against the dehumanization of man; he was against the rigid and clockwork mechanization of Industrial England. While Hume cannot be bothered by this "nonsense", all that there is is Math and Logic. Their meeting was just a disaster waiting to happen. *But I don't hear anyone calling him a jerk. |
01-30-2003, 04:34 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edinburgh. Scotland
Posts: 2,532
|
Hume was Scottish.
From Scotland. |
02-03-2003, 11:29 AM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The Vine
Posts: 12,950
|
seanie is right.
English philosophers are silly. Case in point: bentham. |
02-03-2003, 12:55 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 859
|
Wasn't John Stuart Mill English? Bertrand Russell? Gilbert Ryle, Antony Flew, A.J.Ayer.
Not sure on all of them, but some of them should be Trouble is, I'm Welsh, so, the great Welsh philosophers are...er...oh dear |
02-05-2003, 12:28 AM | #5 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: in my mind
Posts: 276
|
but...
Quote:
2. From http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/r/rousseau.htm Quote:
|
||
02-06-2003, 06:11 AM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
|
Quote:
again silly, but they, the pragmatic, are the ones who are going to survive. |
|
02-07-2003, 12:20 AM | #7 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
|
Quote:
I am still saddened at how Cervantes concluded Don Quixote. I sometimes wish that both Don Quixote and Sancho would ride into the sunset together. But alas this is the reality. There are two choices we can make when face with reality. We could follow Sancho Panza's path and be materialistic. Or we could follow Don Quixote, a man who could not continue to live when he knows that he could no longer follow his dream. Billy Joel has a very interesting song about pragmatism and practicality. Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|