FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2003, 03:23 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
Default Continental Europe vs. Great Britain

or Hume vs. Rousseau

In another forum someone said that I should avoid Rousseau as much as possible, because he is a jerk. He was able to piss everybody off, including Hume.

"He was able to piss Hume..." That is true but only half the story; the other half is that Hume pissed Rousseau, too*. The two were an odd couple from the start, why Hume invited Rousseau to England is beyond me. Hume was, in my opinion, the Philosopher of Industrial England. On the other hand, Rousseau was calling for a return to nature--though he mellowed as the years passed.

'NOW, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!'

This was a speech of Thomas Gradgrind, the main character of C. Dickens's Hard Times; but it might as well been, Hume's speech. Like Thomas Gradgrind, Hume saw no benefit in things not planted on facts. He even advocated that such books "be condemned to flame."

Rousseau was repulsed by this idea. He knew that talking dogs and other myth have their uses. In his Emile, he saw that these stories were important in developing a child's imagination.

From a modern perspective, we can say Rousseau was against the dehumanization of man; he was against the rigid and clockwork mechanization of Industrial England. While Hume cannot be bothered by this "nonsense", all that there is is Math and Logic.

Their meeting was just a disaster waiting to happen.



*But I don't hear anyone calling him a jerk.
Rousseau_CHN is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 04:34 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edinburgh. Scotland
Posts: 2,532
Default

Hume was Scottish.

From Scotland.
seanie is offline  
Old 02-03-2003, 11:29 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The Vine
Posts: 12,950
Default

seanie is right.

English philosophers are silly. Case in point: bentham.
August Spies is offline  
Old 02-03-2003, 12:55 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 859
Default

Wasn't John Stuart Mill English? Bertrand Russell? Gilbert Ryle, Antony Flew, A.J.Ayer.

Not sure on all of them, but some of them should be

Trouble is, I'm Welsh, so, the great Welsh philosophers are...er...oh dear
Adrian Selby is offline  
Old 02-05-2003, 12:28 AM   #5
xoc
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: in my mind
Posts: 276
Default but...

Quote:
Originally posted by seanie
Hume was Scottish.

From Scotland.
1. Scotland is part of Great Britain
2. From http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/r/rousseau.htm

Quote:
he(Rous) returned to the Isle St. Pierre in the Lake of Bienne. The government of Berne ordered him out of its territory, and he accepted the asylum offered to him by David Hume in England (Jan., 1766)
xoc is offline  
Old 02-06-2003, 06:11 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
English philosophers are silly.
silly but pragmatic. where in the world can you find the leftist party accomadating capitalist into their organization? Britain and China. Ah yes, but the CCP borrowed the idea from the labour party.

again silly, but they, the pragmatic, are the ones who are going to survive.
Rousseau_CHN is offline  
Old 02-07-2003, 12:20 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
again silly, but they, the pragmatic, are the ones who are going to survive.
Just to add to my last post. It is sad that things like idealism must give way to the harsh fact of realities.

I am still saddened at how Cervantes concluded Don Quixote. I sometimes wish that both Don Quixote and Sancho would ride into the sunset together.

But alas this is the reality. There are two choices we can make when face with reality. We could follow Sancho Panza's path and be materialistic. Or we could follow Don Quixote, a man who could not continue to live when he knows that he could no longer follow his dream.

Billy Joel has a very interesting song about pragmatism and practicality.

Quote:
I believe I have passed the age of consciousness and righteous rage// I found out that just surviving was a noble fight//And I once have causes too, I have my pointless point of view, but life goes on no matter who was wrong or right.
Ah, John Lennon. Too bad he died early...but should he survive longer, he probably would be saying the same thing: I once have causes too...
Rousseau_CHN is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:21 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.