Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-22-2002, 03:27 PM | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
|
Quote:
|
|
03-22-2002, 03:37 PM | #12 |
Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
|
You're welcome... but Man after Man is, to the best of my recollection, out of print. I bought it (and another Dixon alternative-history evolution book, The New Dinosaurs) from an online bookstore.
Another good book is Wayne Barlowe's Expedition, which deals with a voyage to the planet Darwin IV, where animals have evolved to be very different from Earth fauna. three, I can't predict what life on Earth will be like in the future because evolution is influenced by the environment, and I have no idea how that's going to change. Dixon makes an assumption of nuclear war and goes on from there. What forces are going to shape the future? Pandemics, world starvation, a runaway greenhouse effect? Until I know this, I can't guess how the consequences will alter the human populations. For the purposes of my novels, I sometimes accelerate evolution so that drastic changes in populations occur in only centuries, but there I'm god and can control all the variables. |
03-22-2002, 03:51 PM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,369
|
The only prediction I feel can be accurately made is that most predictions about human evolution will prove wrong except in the extreme short term.
New technologies such as genetic engineering, cybernetics and molecular nanotechnology will allow humanity to control our own evolution and become more or less whatever we want. (Within limits of course.) We can predict what will happen in the short term... (people already are...) but in the long run our increased technology and experience will allow us to choose evolutionary and biological advantages that haven't even occured to us yet. |
03-23-2002, 12:03 AM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
I prefer After Man to Man After Man, but they're both pretty good.
|
03-23-2002, 09:47 AM | #15 |
Beloved Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: rural part of los angeles, CA
Posts: 4,516
|
I don't really see the human race having enough time to evolve much, though we may actually get a chance to kick those useless wisdom teeth out in a few hundred more generations. I've always assumed we will wipe ourselves out and leave the dessicated planet to the beetles, starting over.
My favorite scifi evolution scenario is in Arthur C. Clarke's Childhoods End. |
03-23-2002, 03:36 PM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Useless Bay
Posts: 1,434
|
pescifish, I think it's entirely possible that humans will wipe themselves out on one planet, but once we break out of this box, I feel it is much less likely that we will destroy ourselves on all planets simultaneously. If we can just hang on for another fifty years...
|
03-23-2002, 04:15 PM | #17 |
Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
|
Originally posted by pescifish:
<strong>I've always assumed we will wipe ourselves out and leave the dessicated planet to the beetles </strong> You're optimistic. I would have gone with the bacteria. |
03-23-2002, 04:17 PM | #18 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
|
Quote:
|
|
03-23-2002, 06:14 PM | #19 | |
Beloved Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: rural part of los angeles, CA
Posts: 4,516
|
Quote:
I am curious, though -- what do you think will happen within the next 50 yrs? |
|
03-23-2002, 08:34 PM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Useless Bay
Posts: 1,434
|
Quote:
Incidentally, another reason I'm interested in colonizing Mars is that I think it could be beneficial to the future of human evolution. Humans have defeated one of the mechanisms of evolution--isolation of populations--by becoming so mobile. Genes travel all over the world now and mix readily. While this is a good thing in many respects, it does have an impact on the pace and mechanisms of evolution. Have a separate population on Mars would give different populations a chance to evolve differently. Possibly. Assuming we don't switch to genetic engineering first. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|