Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-19-2002, 05:14 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: From:
Posts: 203
|
Language is negative.
I don't have the time to make this long and 'interesting' but
Language is not an advantage of humans. It slows down learning, complicates facts, arguments and communication. Creation/Evolution debates would be long over if people had a method of transferring thoughts instead of misunderstanding misquoting misreading and misrepresenting each other. If you could absorb thoughts instead of complicating them with language, you could learn much closer to your intellectual capacity than with language. Language is also a barrier between cultures: if the world didn't have hundreds of languages we would not create new and pointless fields of learning required only in order to communicate. Without language, we would not get very far, but with something better, we would get much farther. |
06-19-2002, 05:38 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
|
Hmm. Transferring thoughts. Why didn't I think of that?
|
06-19-2002, 05:41 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Language has enabled humans to journey into regions of abstraction/abstract thought that are not available to our more limited cousins.
How could we transfer thoughts without some kind of common "language" to communicate and understand them with? Contrary to being a hindrance, language enables, accelerates, and preserves learning. Without language, we (like chimps) would not have a huge volume of written history from which to draw, and would not have a vehicle to pass what we learn, in every subject, down to following generations. The problem with a plurality of languages is not that they are languages but that there are more than one. |
06-19-2002, 05:43 PM | #4 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 279
|
Quote:
|
|
06-19-2002, 06:18 PM | #5 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Home
Posts: 229
|
ishalon....
It seems to me that language has two major functions: (1) to communicate thoughts with others; and (2) to express our thoughts. What gives you reason to believe this is not the case? owleye |
06-19-2002, 07:01 PM | #6 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: From:
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
Quote:
Contrary to being a hindrance, language enables, accelerates, and preserves learning. Without language, we (like chimps) would not have a huge volume of written history from which to draw, and would not have a vehicle to pass what we learn, in every subject, down to following generations. [/qb][/quote] what if we were almost born with it? Quote:
|
|||
06-19-2002, 07:03 PM | #7 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: From:
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
the point is that language is limiting us |
|
06-19-2002, 07:04 PM | #8 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: From:
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
|
|
06-19-2002, 07:06 PM | #9 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: From:
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
|
|
06-20-2002, 12:24 AM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Indus
Posts: 1,038
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|