Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-03-2002, 12:02 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A place in the Northern Hemisphere of Planet Earth
Posts: 1,250
|
Do the eucharistic miracles prove the eucharist is Jesus' body?
I have recently watched a video which showed of the Eucharistic miracles in Lunciano, Italy. A priest had doubts about his faith, and the Eucharist turned to flesh. When they took the blood to be tested, they found it was still very fresh blood, but it was dated to be 1300 years old. normal human blood starts to turn an ugly color and get all dried up after about 15 mins if it is not refrigerated. This blood didn't. It was still perfect but yet dated to be 1300 years old. How is this possible? This miracle happened in 700 A.D. If you wanna research it yourself, find by me.
|
12-03-2002, 12:05 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
|
I believe in miracles however I have not heard of this one...
|
12-03-2002, 12:32 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middletown, CT
Posts: 7,333
|
Gotta love those 700 A.D. dating techniques and videocameras...
|
12-03-2002, 01:44 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,535
|
I take it you watched a video about a Eucharistic miracle alleged to have taken place around A.D. 700. Some of the blood from that miracle has been preserved through the centuries, tested recently, and despite its fresh appearance is aged 1300 years.
Here's <a href="http://www.concernedcatholics.org/miracles.htm" target="_blank">one account</a> of the tale. <a href="http://www.therealpresence.org/eucharst/mir/lanciano.html" target="_blank">Another here</a>. Google for "Lanciano." The tests from 1981 confirm that it is human tissue. Perhaps I'm just cynical, but I wonder how they prevented any substitution hocus-pocus. That is, I don't see any dating technique to show 1300-year-old blood, and not a recent substitution. Strange how this and the Shroud make out Jesus as blood type AB. Such a generous guy I'd peg as type O -- the universal donor. [ December 03, 2002: Message edited by: Grumpy ]</p> |
12-03-2002, 02:29 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A place in the Northern Hemisphere of Planet Earth
Posts: 1,250
|
The Flesh is real Flesh. The Blood is real Blood.
The Flesh and the Blood belong to the human species. The Flesh consists of the muscular tissue of the heart. In the Flesh we see present in section: the myocardium, the endocardium, the vagus nerve and also the left ventricle of the heart for the large thickness of the myocardium. The Flesh is a "HEART" complete in its essential structure. The Flesh and the Blood have the same blood-type: AB (Blood-type identical to that which Prof. Baima Bollone uncovered in the Holy Shroud of Turin). In the Blood there were found proteins in the same normal proportions (percentage-wise) as are found in the sero-proteic make-up of the fresh normal blood. In the Blood there were also found these minerals: chlorides, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, sodium and calcium. The preservation of the Flesh and of the Blood, which were left in their natural state for twelve centuries and exposed to the action of atmospheric and biological agents, remains an extraordinary phenomenon. Do these things make it sound like the flesh is just from humans? or does this not suggest divine presence? |
12-03-2002, 02:36 PM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Your description suggests a large dose of gullibility to me.
|
12-03-2002, 02:43 PM | #7 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
And also sugggests a bit of uncredited plagarizing as well. Most of your last post was quoted verbatim from <a href="http://www.cmns.mnegri.it/miracolo/shortdesc.html" target="_blank">this site</a> or another site containing the same material.
[ December 03, 2002: Message edited by: Mageth ]</p> |
12-03-2002, 02:43 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Two Steps Ahead
Posts: 1,124
|
Eh, please. Let me get this straight. In 700 AD, a priest found his Eucharist had turned to flesh of some sort, along with blood. This flesh was tested in 1981, and was found to be fresh?
That's absurd, and it's relatively obvious what happened. El switcheroo. |
12-03-2002, 02:45 PM | #9 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
If you do a little research, you'll find that the flesh is not "fresh" by any stretch of the imagination. (Go to the link I posted, for example).
[ December 03, 2002: Message edited by: Mageth ]</p> |
12-03-2002, 03:42 PM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 602
|
Quote:
Fiach |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|