FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2002, 12:19 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 247
Post Where is church state separation outlined?

As the tilte asks. Is it in the constitution, if so where?

Thanks
Hans is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 12:28 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 368
Post

It is in the first Amendment to the Constitution.

From <a href="http://www.archives.gov/exhibit_hall//charters_of_freedom/bill_of_rights/amendments_1-10.html" target="_blank">here</a>:

Quote:
Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
(emphasis added is mine)
queue is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 12:33 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

Add to that the 14th amendment which extends the Bill of Rights to apply to the states.

And the 200+ years of case law that have interpreted the First Amendment.
Mageth is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 12:55 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 247
Post

Thanks again.

Mageth,

Is there a particular case the supreme court heard wherein they interpreted the first amendment as the church and state shall be separate? I would like to look it up and read it.
Hans is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 12:55 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 385
Post

Also add that if you want to know what the original intent of the Establishment Clause is, study Madison the author of the clause. And you will find that separation is part of the Establishment Clause.

But "original intenters" ignore the facts when it doesn't meet with their viewpoint.
Peregrine is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 12:59 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Hans:
Is there a particular case the supreme court heard wherein they interpreted the first amendment as the church and state shall be separate? I would like to look it up and read it.
Hugo Black in Everson v Board of Education:

"The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach."

That was in 1947. Apparently things have changed.

[ June 27, 2002: Message edited by: hezekiah jones ]</p>
hezekiah jones is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 01:00 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 247
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Peregrine:
Also add that if you want to know what the original intent of the Establishment Clause is, study Madison the author of the clause. And you will find that separation is part of the Establishment Clause.

But "original intenters" ignore the facts when it doesn't meet with their viewpoint.
My own opinion of the "original intenters" is that their veiwpoint, as well as mine, is irrelevent. The supreme court has been given the authority and duty of making those interpretations, not them or myself.
Hans is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 01:02 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 385
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Hans:
<strong>Thanks again.

Mageth,

Is there a particular case the supreme court heard wherein they interpreted the first amendment as the church and state shall be separate? I would like to look it up and read it.</strong>
Two off the top of my head:

Abington v. Schempp (1963) school prayer
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) established the Lemon Test for church/state issues
Peregrine is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 01:05 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

Hans:

Here's a good <a href="http://members.tripod.com/~candst/" target="_blank">web page</a> on the Separation of Church and State that seems to have covered just about everything.
Mageth is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 01:07 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 385
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Hans:
<strong>

My own opinion of the "original intenters" is that their veiwpoint, as well as mine, is irrelevent. The supreme court has been given the authority and duty of making those interpretations, not them or myself.</strong>
Rhenquist, Scalia, and Thomas are original intenters.

A bit OT here: Scalia sees the original intent of the 2nd Amendment as being permiting individuals the right to carry whatever an infantryman can carry. He was asked if that included handgrenades and he said "yes."
Peregrine is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:19 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.