FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-29-2002, 03:31 AM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 104
Post

Isn't this argument as old as Henry Morris and "The Genesis Flood"? It's pretty easy to refute. For one thing, stratigraphic sorting also applies to plants, which are not noted for their mobility. It's a little hard to imagine a herd of flowering plants charging uphill to escape the oncoming Flood. And what about dinosaur eggs? These are found in the same strata as their parents, sometimes still intact in their nests. Unless Mommy dinosaur picked up the clutch and ran with them, I'd say that the sorting argument is dead in the water.
semyaza is offline  
Old 11-29-2002, 03:59 AM   #12
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 473
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tgamble:
<strong>

But with little difference... </strong>
Yes

the difference being that lawyers can't lie as solidly as creationists can and get away with it.

And then, once I've made enough money to suit my retirement well, I'll "come out" tell the world I'm full of bollocks, and move back to Australia.
Camaban is offline  
Old 11-29-2002, 04:11 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by semyaza:
<strong>Isn't this argument as old as Henry Morris and "The Genesis Flood"? It's pretty easy to refute. </strong>
What part of creation "science" isn't? He's the moron who started this damn cult in the first place.
tgamble is offline  
Old 11-29-2002, 04:23 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Duvenoy:
In another thread, the sheer volumn and violence of the water necessary to cover the earth in such a brief amount of time was discussed. I think it would probably have ripped loose the topsoil clear down to bedrock.
Well as I have pointed out to many a creationist before now, the amount of topsoil varies all over the planet, where I used to live in Wiltshire it amounted to only 6 inches or so, in some places it is several metres and in others nothing at all, a global flood would just distribute this topsoil all over the planet in a reasonably random way (with of course more of it being deposited in deep ocean basins than any where else purely because of gravity), this would lead one to predict an average sediment depth of a couple of feet or so, hardly enough to bury a single large ammonite never mind the tens of metres of ammonites above it in the fossil record.

Of course I am still waiting for the creationist explanation of Brachiosaur footprints on a vertical rock surface 15,000 ft up in the alps, at the time the footprints were made the surface was wet silt, did these 100 ton dino's climb a vertical cliff face in order to escape the flood?

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 11-29-2002, 05:05 AM   #15
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Post

Quote:
For one thing, stratigraphic sorting also applies to plants, which are not noted for their mobility.
Yeah, I like to point out that seed ferns and cypress trees both grow/grew in swamps, and the seed ferns all got buried. Apparently cypresses don't just have "knees," but also feet to run from the flood.
Coragyps is offline  
Old 11-29-2002, 05:06 AM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 80
Post

Weren't there a few fossils in the Gobi Desert that could confirm that? I think one involved a protoceratops (primitive, hornless precursor to triceratops) and a velociraptor; they had killed each other and were found that way. Or there was an "intact" (insofar as fossils can be) nest of protoceratops eggs, with one of them in the process of hatching.

Or we could use the Belgian iguanodon mine... contrive me a flood scenario that could dump that many iguanodons in the same coal mine AND flatten the world, then erode away the mountains and the Grand Canyon, without the iguanodons becomin' coal or oil themselves!
Sandslice is offline  
Old 11-29-2002, 05:16 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
Post

Another fun question to ask the Phlood Phreaks is: Where did Moe get his drinking water upon landfall? Wouldn't the lakes and rivers be pretty contaminated with salt and silt (and typhus, etc)?



doov
Duvenoy is offline  
Old 11-29-2002, 05:18 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tgamble:
<strong>

You sadistic bastard! Letting patrick loose on this guy would cause a blood bath. It would be a slaughter, a masacre, he'd tear him into little pieces and walk away with so much as a scratch. It would be horrible to watch.

Go for it Pat!! </strong>
Until I find time to actually write something new on this topic, check out some of my old posts and articles:

<a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=3&t=000983&p=" target="_blank">Does the geologic column really exist?</a>

Look at the post talking about graptolites and ammonites.

There is also a good thread from Dec 2001 called "Questions for "In His Name"" that contains some good info on flood sorting. I couldn't get the thread to come up using the search function for some reason. Maybe someone can find it? If not, I have a saved copy I can repost.

My article on <a href="http://www.geocities.com/earthhistory/ff.htm" target="_blank">Fossils and the flood</a> also has lots of good information relevant to flood sorting, as does my article on
<a href="http://www.geocities.com/earthhistory/roth.htm" target="_blank">Fossil Reefs, Flood Geology, and Recent Creation.</a> Regarding the claims about coal seams, see <a href="http://www.geocities.com/earthhistory/aigcoal.htm" target="_blank">AiG on coal and the flood.</a> Regarding the catastrophic plate tectonics espoused by the guy in the post, see the article <a href="http://www.geocities.com/earthhistory/CT.htm" target="_blank">Sea-floor spreading and the age of the Earth.</a>

Still more examples of sorting are discussed in my article on <a href="http://www.geocities.com/earthhistory/permo.htm" target="_blank">the Permian-Triassic extinction:</a> see the section on Biostratigraphic Correlation of end-Permian Marine Deposits. Glenn Morton also has a couple of article that are relevant here: <a href="http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/pollen.htm" target="_blank">Pollen order presents problems for the global flood,</a> <a href="http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/micro.htm" target="_blank">Microfossil stratigraphy presents problems for the Flood,</a> <a href="http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/fish.htm" target="_blank">Fish cause problems for the global flood.</a> and <a href="http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/flee.htm" target="_blank">Fleeing from the Flood--an exercise in futility.</a>

Enjoy.

Patrick

[ November 29, 2002: Message edited by: ps418 ]</p>
ps418 is offline  
Old 11-29-2002, 05:20 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,877
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Camaban:
<strong>

Yes

the difference being that lawyers can't lie as solidly as creationists can and get away with it.

And then, once I've made enough money to suit my retirement well, I'll "come out" tell the world I'm full of bollocks, and move back to Australia.</strong>
That's what you think *now*. But once the lust for money and power and sexy, weak-willed members of your congregation grabs you, it will never let go! BWAAHAAAHAAAHAAAA!!!

Gregg
Gregg is offline  
Old 11-29-2002, 09:49 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,535
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally posted by Duvenoy:
...the sheer volumn and violence of the water necessary to cover the earth in such a brief amount of time... would probably have ripped loose the topsoil clear down to bedrock. Any and all fossils found would have been a helter-skelter of all species including our own.
It's unclear exactly how much "violence" we're talking about, but I imagine that much floodwater would probably disarticulate every organism it encountered. It's amazing we find any two bones that fit together. (Assuming, of course, that fossils found associated with others are, in fact, part of the same animal!)
Grumpy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:06 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.