Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-16-2003, 11:55 AM | #51 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
|
Quote:
For what it's worth, I do think that the sexual part of a marriage relationship is important. But I don't believe that unless it is 'tested' before the marriage, it can't be wonderful. And anyway, those who think they've 'tested it' to their satisfaction before the marriage may find things change if/when they have children. Helen |
|
06-16-2003, 12:11 PM | #52 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: where orange blossoms bloom...
Posts: 1,802
|
Quote:
|
|
06-16-2003, 12:35 PM | #53 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
|
Quote:
And in the cases where there is a such a great size discrepancy that sex could never work, which other people on this thread have said does happen, surely the man at least would know that he is way bigger than average. It seems to me that technique and inability to relax probably account for most problems in sexual relationships and these are things that can be addressed. Helen |
|
06-16-2003, 01:12 PM | #54 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
|
Quote:
Can you know what driving a car is like if you've never done it? How about if you've only driven an old volvo your entire life? Remember, you're not allowed to even THINK about driving a mustang, that's just as bad as cheating on your volvo. It's arrogant to assume you know what something's all about when you've never had any experience. Can you learn to swim from reading a book? Can I go to a counselor to learn to be a better pairs ice skater? No. You can "believe" whatever bullshit you want to believe (the parallels here are so oddly familiar!) but trying to shove it off as fact onto people who know better is truly maddening. Ok, hold on, back up. I'm sorry. I'm trying something new today. I take back everything insulting I said in the previous paragraph (but I'm still curious about the analogies). When you say "that doesn't make it true", I feel angry. I feel you're accusing me of either lying or just saying things to hear myself talk. I feel very upset and very vulnerable. When I offer up my experiences, only to have them completely discarded, it makes me angry, and I respond in an angry manner (which is inappropriate). *flips in the book to see what else to say* Ah, here we go. That's what I was forgetting. I want to be taken seriously. I've managed to put myself through sexual hell (and sexual heaven), and I wish someone with no sexual experience at all could at least treat my experiences as if they had some merit. |
|
06-16-2003, 01:21 PM | #55 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
|
Quote:
How do you know you know better than me? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Just how long have you been married anyway? What do you know about marriage? Helen |
|||||
06-16-2003, 01:25 PM | #56 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is, however, something you don't seem to get. You have no experience of what it is to live your life chaste, and then have sex with only one partner. Doesn't that make it JUST as arrogant for you to presume to know what that is like? Quote:
You may know more about some aspects of sex than J. Random Newbie who has sex only with one partner. That doesn't make you better, and it doesn't even mean you necessarily know more about "sex" in general - only that you know specific kinds of things. Quote:
Your experiences have merit, but that doesn't make you *better* than someone who has fewer or different experiences. |
||||
06-16-2003, 01:26 PM | #57 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-16-2003, 01:28 PM | #58 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa Bay area
Posts: 3,471
|
WOW------
What a fast moving thread!! Can't believe that my post is buried back 2 pages ago so shortly. Just shows to go you that just about everyone is interested in sex. I still think that for most people------assuming so many natural things have attracted them = 2 virgins to each other, (because of pheromones etc.)---that they will have an absolute BALL on their wedding night and for many days afterwards--a honeymoon to be remembered forever. And that is a memory that those who have already "done it" and lived together for months or years will NEVER have. As I said before-----You can tell by the sparkle in the eyes of honeymooners and you can tell by the lack of sparkles in the eyes of honeymooners-------which were the virgins and which were not. And, of course, there are very unfortunate exceptions to "natures rule" that sexual compatibility finds its mate. ---------And that is really a shame. But I think that that is a very SMALL minority of couples. Just my not so humble opinion. |
06-16-2003, 01:29 PM | #59 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
|
Quote:
|
|
06-16-2003, 01:29 PM | #60 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
|
Quote:
Not that multiple partners is bad, or anything - if it works for you, kudos. I won't tell you that it's wrong or gross or whatever because it's your thing. Just like monogamy is my thing. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|