Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-23-2003, 05:46 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
|
Shut up already
I promise to do that if you, atheist and theist alike, could answer the one question that is bothering me: Angels.
Why is it that man have to face temptation and suffer pain to be with God? While Angels, on the otherhand, were already created to be with God--without facing temptation of suffering pain? It just doesn't seem fair. |
01-23-2003, 05:55 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
|
...and God being a God of Justice and Fairness.
|
01-23-2003, 07:39 AM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Void
Posts: 396
|
I think that some of the "reasoning" behind it is that Angels™ don't have Free Will™. In that sense, being in the presence of God isn't so much a "reward" as it is a burden.
|
01-23-2003, 07:53 AM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In a nondescript, black helicopter.
Posts: 6,637
|
According to standard christian doctrine Angels do have free will, how else would Satan rebel? This does leave open that this life is not required and we could have simply been put in the presence of god. Which opens a viscious can of worms in my opinion.
|
01-23-2003, 08:10 AM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,387
|
Quote:
|
|
01-23-2003, 08:14 AM | #6 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Void
Posts: 396
|
Quote:
The Bibbbbble is a bit obscure on that particular point. |
|
01-23-2003, 08:26 AM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,359
|
Angels. Why?
Easy answer.
Ancient myth for primitive cultures that people just WON'T FREAKIN' LET GO! That said, let's continue evolving now. Move along. Move along. |
01-23-2003, 10:47 AM | #8 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
|
Two short answers:
1. Go rent Dogma 2. What ArvelJoffi said! |
01-23-2003, 10:58 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In a nondescript, black helicopter.
Posts: 6,637
|
I do think that it's interesting (and another bible/dogma contradiction). Melkor is right when he says the bible is ambiguous on the point of Satan's fall, in fact it never mentions it at all. There is a passage about Lucifer in Isaiah, but that refers to a king, not Satan. Nor does Genesis say anything about Satan tempting Eve, it says serpent. Satan in the bible is actually god's angel, his function is to tempt and be an adversary. (In fact, Satan is greek for adversary). There are several biblical references where Satan is in a place of importance and hardly referred to as god's archenemy, until we get to revelations.
But as I have posted the likes of this several times this week already, I now go to the snack machine for a candy bar. Good day! |
01-23-2003, 12:20 PM | #10 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Void
Posts: 396
|
Quote:
I'm rather of the opinion that "Satan" as the popular concept is much less rooted in the Bibbble than most "Christians" think. Or, as I have seen discussed around here, the concept of "Hell" as a part of the afterlife, for that matter. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|