![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,301
|
![]() Quote:
The quotes I've seen from villages say as much. And in many cases I've seen reports that the US military enters a town to get cheered only to leave shortly after arrival. Iraqi loyalists come in and kill civilians to scare them. I think the US needs to get their ass in gear and get the aide into towns and villages. But here's the problem I see. If they stay in towns, they are "occupying them". If they just leave, they are going to get civilians killed. In this case I would hope they would say "public opinion be damned, we'll stay if we have too" and worry more about protecting people then saving face. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: middle of no where
Posts: 4
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,570
|
![]()
your links suck, Moss.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 3,477
|
![]()
This is terrible, but when is Donald Rumsfeld going to tell domestic media to stop showing these, lest they "violate the Geneva convention" also? I've repeatedly seen these images paraded on American television, so as far as I'm concerned, al Jazeera is off the hook.
I think there is some value in seeing the consequences of war, but enough is enough. As usual, the media turns hypocrite and becomes morally inverted. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,301
|
![]() Quote:
Releasing the pictures isn't against the Geneva convention, nor did the pentagon say it was. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
|
![]() Quote:
Because that's exactly how it sounds. And your argument is nothing more in the end than an apology for terrorism. Let's take your "logic" further: Back when the USA admin was applauding Pinochet's takeover of Chile, would it have been perfectly OK for Chilean terrorists to target American children --- or just accidentally kill them as collateral damage --- because their parents brought children into the world in a system that was at a few removes supporting a very oppresive system elsewhere ? |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|