FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 02:40 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-25-2003, 04:24 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,301
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LadyShea
Yes, but if our homeland was invaded, even for justified reasons, would you just lay down and let them kill your children and destroy your home or would you pick up a gun.

You expect the Iraqi people to do just what exactly against an invading force? They tried rising up against Saddam in GWI and we promised to support that effort then left 'em out to hang...I would be a little gun shy about trusting America
That is a great point and I would consider that a big reason why we aren't seeing the uprising we expected.

The quotes I've seen from villages say as much.
And in many cases I've seen reports that the US military enters a town to get cheered only to leave shortly after arrival. Iraqi loyalists come in and kill civilians to scare them.

I think the US needs to get their ass in gear and get the aide into towns and villages.

But here's the problem I see. If they stay in towns, they are "occupying them". If they just leave, they are going to get civilians killed.

In this case I would hope they would say "public opinion be damned, we'll stay if we have too" and worry more about protecting people then saving face.
Liquidrage is offline  
Old 03-25-2003, 04:47 PM   #12
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: middle of no where
Posts: 4
Default

a link for the pictures :


http://www.honaweb.com/bush/


[Moderator--Link fixed]
Moss is offline  
Old 03-25-2003, 04:51 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,570
Default

your links suck, Moss.
Primordial Groove is offline  
Old 03-25-2003, 06:19 PM   #14
Zar
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 3,477
Default

This is terrible, but when is Donald Rumsfeld going to tell domestic media to stop showing these, lest they "violate the Geneva convention" also? I've repeatedly seen these images paraded on American television, so as far as I'm concerned, al Jazeera is off the hook.

I think there is some value in seeing the consequences of war, but enough is enough. As usual, the media turns hypocrite and becomes morally inverted.
Zar is offline  
Old 03-25-2003, 06:39 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 1,301
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Zar
This is terrible, but when is Donald Rumsfeld going to tell domestic media to stop showing these, lest they "violate the Geneva convention" also? I've repeatedly seen these images paraded on American television, so as far as I'm concerned, al Jazeera is off the hook.

I think there is some value in seeing the consequences of war, but enough is enough. As usual, the media turns hypocrite and becomes morally inverted.
Where have you seen the interviews on American Television?

Releasing the pictures isn't against the Geneva convention, nor did the pentagon say it was.
Liquidrage is offline  
Old 03-25-2003, 11:00 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LadyShea

I am more horrifed by the pictures of dead Iraqi children and civilians. Soldiers choose to take the risk of dying in battle, children have no such choice.

Originally posted by 99Percent

No, but the parents of these children had a choice - to face the oppression of the brutal tyrannical Saddam regime instead of having more children born into it.

The cost of liberty is the willingness to fight and die for it. If you are complacent and a coward you will have to face the consequences of death, whether yours of your children's, under brutal conditions.
99%, are you saying that it is perfectly acceptable to commit violence against children because their parents made choices you do not agree with ?
Because that's exactly how it sounds.

And your argument is nothing more in the end than an apology for terrorism.

Let's take your "logic" further:
Back when the USA admin was applauding Pinochet's takeover of Chile, would it have been perfectly OK for Chilean terrorists to target American children --- or just accidentally kill them as collateral damage --- because their parents brought children into the world in a system that was at a few removes supporting a very oppresive system elsewhere ?
Gurdur is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:18 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.