FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-04-2003, 08:16 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Biblical paradox

Quote:
Originally posted by conkermaniac
Did any of them have an IQ over 100? Err...no. Seriously, these men were so blinded by faith that they were totally unable to analyze the Bible in a rational and objective manner. If they ever saw something that looked a bit strange, they ignored it and took the word for what it was. That is why they were never able to find any contradictions when it was right in front of their eyes.
Nice stereotype. So I guess everyone with a doctorate in theology is stupid and lacks intelligence?

Quote:
Then I dare you to go ahead and address all the issues listed on this page. Oh, and don't forget to justify the flood too -- you seem to have "conveniently" abandoned your thread over in the E/C forum.
Why bother, you won't listen to any of my explanations. You will just come up with some not so witty, sarcastic response to insult me.

Quote:
Damn right we're insulting the intelligence of billions of Christians who have never questioned this *bull* (excuse my language). Chrstians make up 33% of the world's population, yet 99% of the world's geniuses are nonreligious. Doing the math, less than 0.4% of all geniuses are Christian. How is this to be accounted for?
Hardly. Einstein believed in God, Hawkings attributes the universe to a higher power, Newton was a Christian etc. Some of the most famous geniouses and scientists in history were Christian or theists. Much more than 1%. And not that you'd believe it, but I do have near genius IQ, if not over the genious mark. And I'm a musical prodigy. But since I believe in God, i must be stupid right?
Magus55 is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 08:45 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Biblical paradox

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
And not that you'd believe it, but I do have near genius IQ, if not over the genious mark. And I'm a musical prodigy. But since I believe in God, i must be stupid right?
We don't believe it because you haven't demonstrated it in your posts, and because you haven't given us any evidence.
winstonjen is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 08:49 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Biblical paradox

Quote:
Originally posted by winstonjen
We don't believe it because you haven't demonstrated it in your posts, and because you haven't given us any evidence.
I haven't demonstrated it in my posts, because I don't accept your view of the world as fact? Talk about close minded. So, in other words, you can only be intelligent if you accept scientific observation as fact, and dismiss God and religion as myth? Gotcha. You certaintly don't lack in the arrogance and pride department.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 08:58 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: American in China
Posts: 620
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Biblical paradox

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Nice stereotype. So I guess everyone with a doctorate in theology is stupid and lacks intelligence?
The first part was a joke, but the second part was not. Anyone with a doctorate in theology has already been so blinded by faith that they cannot possibly look at the Bible in an objective, rational manner.

Quote:
Why bother, you won't listen to any of my explanations. You will just come up with some not so witty, sarcastic response to insult me.
Because you cannot come up with a decent explanation to save your life (or at least I haven't seen one). Your credibility has been in doubt ever since I saw you run away from that flood thread. You seem to argue exclusively in the threads where only the most obvious responses are necessary. Go ahead, give an explanation to all those contradictions. I won't insult you (I probably won't even respond), but I just want to see how you would respond to those arguments.

Quote:
Hardly. Einstein believed in God, Hawkings attributes the universe to a higher power,
Neither Einstein nor Hawking were Christians, and I don't really believe that Einstein admitted that there was a God. Didn't someone else already have this discussion with you?
Quote:
Newton was a Christian etc.
Because back then, people didn't know any better. There was no notion of evolution and Big Bang...heck, some people still insisted that the earth was flat! I am sure that if you presented Newton with the evidence that we know today to be true, he would hardily give up his religious beliefs.
Quote:
Some of the most famous geniouses and scientists in history were Christian or theists. Much more than 1%.
Keyword: in history...circa 1400.
Quote:
And not that you'd believe it, but I do have near genius IQ, if not over the genious mark. And I'm a musical prodigy.
And are many others on this forum. You're certainly much better than the average fundamentalist Christian, although you certainly could certainly improve on your modesty.
Quote:
But since I believe in God, i must be stupid right?
I never said that. There are many Christians these days who regard much of the Bible as myth, yet believe in a God. I certainly would not generalize such people as stupid. However, because you take the Bible literally, I find it extremely hard to believe that you are indeed as smart as you claim to be. That's why I want to see how you interpret those "supposed" contradictions.
conkermaniac is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 02:43 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Biblical paradox

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Hardly. Einstein believed in God, Hawkings attributes the universe to a higher power, Newton was a Christian etc. Some of the most famous geniouses and scientists in history were Christian or theists. Much more than 1%.
Probably because they were forced to under threat of death from the Church. The Catholic Church which you hate so much.

Quote:
And not that you'd believe it, but I do have near genius IQ, if not over the genious mark. And I'm a musical prodigy. But since I believe in God, i must be stupid right?
Quote:
haven't demonstrated it in my posts, because I don't accept your view of the world as fact? Talk about close minded. So, in other words, you can only be intelligent if you accept scientific observation as fact, and dismiss God and religion as myth? Gotcha.
Well, I certainly don't start with the presupposition that the bible is true and then discard all contradictory evidence. Talk about self-deception.

Quote:
You certaintly don't lack in the arrogance and pride department.
My irony meter just exploded.
winstonjen is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 03:00 AM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Ah . . . nothing like appeals to authority . . . especially when the authority to whom one appeals disagrees!!

Ironic at best, dishonest at worst.

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 04:18 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Sure, you read some part of the Bible and claim its a contradiction, but since when do you hold more merit over the millions of theologists who have been studying the Bible's supposed contradictions for thousands of years, and have yet to find any verse in the Bible without an explanation?
And since when do YOU hold more merit over the millions of theologists who have been studying the Bible's supposed contradictions for thousands of years, and have concluded that the Bible is NOT inerrant?

In other words: virtually ALL of them?

Even among Christians, only a handful of crackpots believe that the Bible is inerrant. No competent scholar believes that it is, because they can see that it isn't.

No major Christian denomination, except the Southern Baptists and Jehovah's Witnesses IIRC, preaches Biblical inerrancy. Catholicism does not, Anglicanism does not, Lutheranism does not, Presbyterianism does not, Methodism does not...
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 04:24 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

I would also like to know your basis for stating that only Jesus came back from the dead.

PLENTY of people have come back from the dead.

Haven't you even heard of Osiris, Orpheus, Ishtar, Appolonius of Tyana, Sai Baba, and all the MANY other real or mythical people who also came back from the dead?

...What, you don't believe those stories?

Why not?
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 04:28 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Talking Absolutely right!

Quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Bodiless
I would also like to know your basis for stating that only Jesus came back from the dead.

PLENTY of people have come back from the dead.

Haven't you even heard of Osiris, Orpheus, Ishtar, Appolonius of Tyana, Sai Baba, and all the MANY other real or mythical people who also came back from the dead?
Don't forget Lazarus!
winstonjen is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 06:44 AM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: The Biblical paradox

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Except the Bible doesn't contradict itself. Sure, you read some part of the Bible and claim its a contradiction, but since when do you hold more merit over the millions of theologists who have been studying the Bible's supposed contradictions for thousands of years, and have yet to find any verse in the Bible without an explanation? I have yet to see a contradiction in the Bible, so what makes your understanding of the Bible, better than mine? You seem to think the Bible just hit shelves last week. The Bible has been studied endlessly for thousands of years, and is still considered the greatest and most reliable book in history, without contradiction.
You sure about that, with the Bible not contradicting itself? What is it called when you read something in one place, yet in another place the prior statement is negated? In reference to the millions of theologists who have studied the contradictions, I would say they either have done a poor job of getting their analysis out or Bible supporters just like them fail to follow their studies. Christian apologists who frequent here should be qualified to explain away these contradictions. Who considers the Bible the greatest and most reliable book in history? Not me? Maybe you do, but don't speak as though that's an operating consensus for the general population.
Soul Invictus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.